If there is no God. Then someone explain life.

[doorknob]

Meh. I don't find him very engaging either; but as long as he doesn't start spamming the forum, I'm okay with letting him stay.
He seems to remain mostly contained to his own thread and though his responses seem strange and void, he seemingly only gives them as a response on a response to him. He's not doing anything really 'wrong', imo. Don't know on what grounds you'd ban him.
I mean, I don't want to stick my neck out for this guy, but I feel like bans should have legitimate reasons.

point well made. Guess I'll just be bored.

[Mike Cl]

Nucleocosmochronology has not authority over the Psijic Endeavor (the Tri-angled truth).

CHIM is how we break free from the laws and anti-laws of Anu and Padomay.  The Red King has in his eye the Heart of Lorkhan, which he viewed sideways.

No, no, no.  I followed along quite easily until you said 'sideways'.  That makes no sense.  It have been proven to have been viewed backwards! 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I really enjoyed that. I learned a lot.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

I remember the first time a teacher put a word on the board I could read. I learned a lot in the first grade, and that taught me to never stop. Along the way I learned there's a lot of bullshit in the world and a few things worth knowing.

[g2perk]

I remember the first time a teacher put a word on the board I could read. I learned a lot in the first grade, and that taught me to never stop. Along the way I learned there's a lot of bullshit in the world and a few things worth knowing.

I guess the gift is knowing the difference.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

[Mike Cl]

I guess the gift is knowing the difference.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

Then why is it, g2, that you believe in the bullshit?????  Is it just easier to believe something rather than having to look for reasons and think about it????

[g2perk]

Then why is it, g2, that you believe in the bullshit?????  Is it just easier to believe something rather than having to look for reasons and think about it????

And wants BS.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

[sdelsolray]

I guess the gift is knowing the difference.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

Or pretending to know the difference.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I guess the gift is knowing the difference.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

That's why they call me "gifted".

[Mike Cl]

And wants BS.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

Seems you got your want--you believe in the deepest BS there is.

[g2perk]

Seems you got your want--you believe in the deepest BS there is.

Come on mike. Can't admit you was wrong. This is the man that started the big bang theory. He was a priest and a scientist. Best of both worlds.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

[aitm]

14 billion light year universe, suns large enough for most of our solar system to fit into and dweezle here promotes a god that demands a woman's hand be cut off if she should happen to grab a mans testicles while fighting for her life. Yeah….boo-yah. Thats an almighty god for ya.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

In the middle of the Pacific, on a clear moonless night, I sat on the fantail of a cruiser and read a book. The light came from stars thousands or millions of light years away. I was impressed. I looked up and didn't see any god up there.

[stromboli]

Same here. Bridge of a ship in the North Atlantic.

[Mike Cl]

Come on mike. Can't admit you was wrong. This is the man that started the big bang theory. He was a priest and a scientist. Best of both worlds.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk

When I'm wrong I will admit it.  Even to you.  But what was I wrong about?  This man was clearly divided.  Just because a man is a scientist does not make him an expert in all areas of science or life.  I do find it interesting that he used the scientific method in one area but ignored in it in another.  His hypothesis of the big bang has been used and tested by not only himself, but many, many others.  That is the point of science to build knowledge by using the scientific method which allows anybody to test any hypothesis.  If they can show the hypothesis to be false or not provable, then it is considered not true.  If it is true, then it is formed into a theory--which can still be tested. 

His priest side did not use that with his description of god--he, nor anybody else could prove that god is.  Can you?

[g2perk]

When I'm wrong I will admit it.  Even to you.  But what was I wrong about?  This man was clearly divided.  Just because a man is a scientist does not make him an expert in all areas of science or life.  I do find it interesting that he used the scientific method in one area but ignored in it in another.  His hypothesis of the big bang has been used and tested by not only himself, but many, many others.  That is the point of science to build knowledge by using the scientific method which allows anybody to test any hypothesis.  If they can show the hypothesis to be false or not provable, then it is considered not true.  If it is true, then it is formed into a theory--which can still be tested. 

His priest side did not use that with his description of god--he, nor anybody else could prove that god is.  Can you?

Well, like Charles Spurgeon once said

He that is convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.

Sent from my LG-H820 using Tapatalk