| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:34 PM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:51 am Post subject: Vestigial eyes - a creationist's nightmare |
|
|
Salamanders that live in caves have lost over thousands of years their eyesight.
This is what Christopher Hitchens wrote about them to Richard Dawkins:
Vestigial eyes, for example, are clear evidence that these cave salamanders must have had ancestors who were different from them—had eyes, in this case. That is evolution. Why on earth would God create a salamander with vestiges of eyes? If he wanted to create blind salamanders, why not just create blind salamanders? Why give them dummy eyes that don't work and that look as though they were inherited from sighted ancestors? Maybe your point is a little different from this, in which case I don't think I have seen it written down before.
Read the whole article here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Andreusz Royal Citizen

Joined: 11 Jul 2008 Posts: 365 Local time: 8:34 PM Location: Johannesburg

|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| God created vestigial eyes on cave salamanders for the same reason that he placed things that look like the bones of huge "lizards" in certain strata of rocks: in order to test our faith. Essentially, we are not meant to take these things seriously: God has a puckish sense of humour. Genesis ueber alles! (Right, Romans?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moloth Fateless

Joined: 27 Aug 2003 Posts: 23104 Local time: 8:34 PM Location: Warner Robins, GA

|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
lawl..
http://controversy.wearscience.com/
 _________________ -=The Believer is Happy; the Skeptic is Wise=-
www.Moloth.com
Last edited by Moloth on Tue Feb 30, 2026 13:61 am; edited 426 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9894 Local time: 10:34 AM Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is a mollusk that had a simple insect like eye but over time in the oceans deep lost the eye to atrophy. Decedents moved out of the depths and evolved a more fish like eye. Dawkins talks about it in one of his books. That and the fish that evolved two sets of different eyes, one pair that looks up and one pair that looks down. Creationists are screwed. they have no argument for vestigial organs and the irreducible complexity argument is laughable. _________________ Join http://www.sefora.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baddogma antitheist

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 9894 Local time: 10:34 AM Location: Colorado
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kmisho Stochastic

Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Posts: 4795 Local time: 11:34 AM Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
A creationist will simply answer (wrongly) that evolution implies an ever increasing complexity so genetic degradation leading to loss of eyesight isn't evolution proper. _________________ K Michau
Now this religion happens to prevail/Until by that one it is overthrown/Because men dare not live with men alone/But always with another fairy tale.
al-Ma'arri, Syrian Poet, died 1057
You deny the existence of 999 alleged Gods. I merely deny one more - yours.
John MacKinnon Robertson, "Godism" 1896
"Never is a long time." Robert Fripp, 1998
Poetry, Art, Music |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unbeliever Forum Master


Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 2725 Local time: 6:34 PM Location: The exact center of my observable universe
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kmisho wrote: | | A creationist will simply answer (wrongly) that evolution implies an ever increasing complexity so genetic degradation leading to loss of eyesight isn't evolution proper. |
They might answer that way, but that stems from a misunderstanding of evolution theory.
And eyes are not irreducibly complex, as shown in this vid:
http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=30088 _________________ Only those with weak faith feel threatened by those with no faith.
2000 years of Christianity - haven't we wasted enough time!?
God Not Found |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
monkeybyte Forum Master


Joined: 04 Jan 2004 Posts: 3575 Local time: 11:34 AM Location: At E's place for tea.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shiranu Disciple of Slaanesh

Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 3699 Local time: 8:34 PM Location: An Octopusus' Garden with you... (San Antonio)

|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is no such thing as a vestigial organ, evolutionists are editing animals to make them have body parts they shouldn't so they can push their pro-satan theories.
(True story, some one told me that...) _________________ "I never really wanted you to see, The screwed up side of me that I keep...Locked inside of me so deep...It always seems to get to me. I never really wanted you to go, So many things you should have known. I guess for me there's just no hope, I never meant to be so cold..."
"Life feels quite like Hell should, but this Hells so cold...Pull another knife out, stick it with rest of them... when my back is full, turn me around to face it." Trivium |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unbeliever Forum Master


Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 2725 Local time: 6:34 PM Location: The exact center of my observable universe
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like a candidate for FSTDT!  _________________ Only those with weak faith feel threatened by those with no faith.
2000 years of Christianity - haven't we wasted enough time!?
God Not Found |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rickyroma Repressed hippy

Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 6519 Local time: 1:34 AM Location: England
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:33 am Post subject: Re: Vestigial eyes - a creationist's nightmare |
|
|
| josephpalazzo wrote: | | If he wanted to create blind salamanders, why not just create blind salamanders? Why give them dummy eyes that don't work and that look as though they were inherited from sighted ancestors? |
So Hitchens, who claims not to believe in god, is now dictating what an infinitely intelligent creator should have done? How arrogant etc etc... _________________ Theists wank too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
josephpalazzo Illusion Master

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 8036 Local time: 8:34 PM Location: D-brane
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bitch... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Naoryunosuke Forum Plebian


Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 138 Local time: 1:34 AM Location: London, England

|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's rather like the creationist claiming that God created Jupiter to act as a giant asteroid vacuum to keep us safe on Earth. But there are far more simpler ways to keep us safe, like not creating a giant freaking asteroid belt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|