Never mind. The whole article is a giant crock of shit.
Check the article:
The following video, Ben Stein vs Richard Dawkins - reveals that, in reality, Dawkins appears to be nothing more than a creationist, or intelligent-design proponent in denial.
When asked to explain the origin of life, Dawkins answers as follows:
"It could be that...uhhh....at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved by, probably some kind of Darwinian means, to a very, very high level of technology and designed a form of life that they seeded perhaps onto this planet . Uhmm....that is a possibility and an intriguing possibility and I suppose it's possible you might find evidence for that if you look at the detail...the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer."
Now check the question that Dawkins was
actually answering:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginWhat do you think is the possibility that intelligent design turns out to be the answer to some issues in genetics or darwinian evolution?
Start of answer, convieniently snipped
It could come about in the following way... enter above answer
This is dishonesty to a level of "fuck you and fuck your article, dishonest piece of shit".
Of course, likewise the actual interviewer, who also silently skips over the whole "this whole next bit is hypothetical, not something I actually believe, just a possible explanation" to equate Dawkins with a believer in intelligent design.