why do SJW's deconstruct race and sex?

Started by mauricio, November 04, 2015, 10:22:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

peacewithoutgod

SJWs are people who learn absolutely nothing from science. They are 100% idealogical, and if science doesn't fit their ideology, then they reject it flat out. If you dare to pick at the "science" in their arguments, they will shout and scream and get all their friends to attack you as well so that you cannot get two sane words across - and how dare you be such a monster for challenging their ideas!  The Patheos website has an Atheism Channel, and one of the reasons why I stopped hanging out there was that it was awash with SJWs. They don't argue rationally - they pander, they victimize, they stamp their feet and they shout. Led by the likes of Rebecca Watson and lap-dog PZ Meyers, their association with rational atheism has been devastating for any movement to rationalize America, notably what the media has labeled "New Atheism".
There are two types of ideas: fact and non-fact. Ideas which are not falsifiable are non-fact, therefore please don't insist your fantasies of supernatural beings are in any way factual.

Doctrine = not to be questioned = not to be proven = not fact. When you declare your doctrine fact, you lie.


Baruch

Young people have to start somewhere.  And it is impossible to start as anything more than ignorant.  But there is an up side.
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

mauricio

Quote from: Baruch on December 09, 2015, 06:50:12 PM
Young people have to start somewhere.  And it is impossible to start as anything more than ignorant.  But there is an up side.

indeed we are always partially ignorant, correction and refutation should be about sharing knowledge not demonization or "winning".

Baruch

Quote from: mauricio on December 09, 2015, 06:55:26 PM
indeed we are always partially ignorant, correction and refutation should be about sharing knowledge not demonization or "winning".

Which is why I must opposed Josephpalazzo's recent denunciation of free speech.  We can't get better if we demonize or go paranoid.  And if some authority will only allow truth on the Internet ... who shall that be?  Let the arguments continue, if some are uncomfortable with that ... they can hide under their beds.
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.