Author Topic: Rabbis on God  (Read 5116 times)

Offline josephpalazzo

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2015, 04:36:04 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My math is along the lines of measure twice, cut once.

(Jeopardy) What is topology?

Offline Baruch

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2015, 06:29:11 AM »
Not answering for Stromboli and carpentry ... but cutting isn't allowed in topology, just stretching and folding the clothes after being cleaned ;-)
שלום

Offline josephpalazzo

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2015, 09:54:51 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Not answering for Stromboli and carpentry ... but cutting isn't allowed in topology, just stretching and folding the clothes after being cleaned ;-)

You're right I was thinking of Dedekind cut, which is more in set theory than in topology.

Offline Baruch

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2015, 11:10:54 AM »
Yes, if your daughter mentions the Dedekind Cut ... call 911!  She responds with ... "get Real, dad".
שלום

Offline josephpalazzo

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2015, 11:15:33 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Yes, if your daughter mentions the Dedekind Cut ... call 911!  She responds with ... "get Real, dad".

Does that mean you need extra care when you raise a daughter?!??

Offline Baruch

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2015, 11:21:04 AM »
Maybe knot (calling knot theorist) ... a topologist father wouldn't be concerned with anorexia/bulemia ... since the "genus" of his daughter is still the same (technically a toroid, just like our worm ancestors).
שלום

Offline josephpalazzo

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2015, 11:37:49 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Maybe knot (calling knot theorist) ... a topologist father wouldn't be concerned with anorexia/bulemia ... since the "genus" of his daughter is still the same (technically a toroid, just like our worm ancestors).

Yikes, I ain't responding this...

Offline Baruch

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2015, 12:30:07 PM »
Don't you think that embryology is a fertile place for topological research? ;-)
שלום

Offline josephpalazzo

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #23 on: October 03, 2015, 02:55:21 PM »
:017:

Offline Baruch

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #24 on: October 03, 2015, 07:23:14 PM »
Time lapse of an embryo, first it is a sphere, then it folds in on itself ... plus my use of "fertile".
שלום

Offline josephpalazzo

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #25 on: October 03, 2015, 07:45:19 PM »
Research... no. All topological spaces have already been explored. I would classify this kind of research as infertile. (Euler is not proud of you).

Offline Baruch

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #26 on: October 03, 2015, 07:49:31 PM »
Really?  The general metrizability problem (of a topological space) remains ... well worked, but not completely solved.  So further research there, will continue to impinge metrical theories like GR.
שלום

Offline josephpalazzo

Re: Rabbis on God
« Reply #27 on: October 04, 2015, 03:59:39 AM »
Granted but it has nothing with embryos. The biologists don't have to learn topology.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk