I've one question about antman and wasp, since there was a lot of controversy around it in the comics. In the comics, Hank Pym slaps wasp across the face and knocks her over, opening up the controversy of domestic abuse that hasn't ever really gone away with the character.
I know in the MCU Scott Lang is ant man while hank pym is an old version of himself, so doesn't quite have the same dynamic. I just wondered if they decided to stay away from that kind of controversy in this now she's in the story.
-

It's in it's second week and people haven't commented on it here.

I'm probably going to rent it.  I blew all my movie money on Deadpool 2 and Infinity War.  Totally worth it.

justice league was horrible. batman vs superman was horrible. wonder woman was okay but not that special.

I want to believe this could work, and it would be so ironic if it was the one that did. Aquaman is the justice league member considered the lamest, but there have been irritations of him that writers actually gave a shit enough about to make work, like in the justice league unlimited series.

I saw someone reviewing justice league and regarded, all jason momoa did in that was just act like jason momoa, no real acting, yet we know he can act like in game of thrones. So maybe, with a decent director, like James Wan, it could happen.

I like James Wan, he's directed some of my fav horror movies recently, like the conjuring and insidious.

Having Zack Snyder's funk away from this could be what makes it work.

I watched Avengers Civil War.  I was confused.   I thought Captain America would be on the side of Government.  But then I decided Iron Man had to run a business with Government.  But then Spiderman, who had been involved with SHIELD before seemed to be new to the hero game.  It was all a bad mess.

The fights were fun.  I always loved the older Marvel comics when various characters fought each other for seemingly good reasons. 

But this movie was logical crap.

You read old comics but knew nothing about the new ones? Captain America civil war comes from the comics where the same thing happened, but the story was structured differently. In the comics they pushed for the superhero registration act that all superheroes must conform to governmental control after an event that killed many innocent civilians.

Cap opposed it because having superheroes following government control put all power in their hands and he saw it as going against their civil liberties, while Tony .. well he's just a dick and sided with the government because reasons.
Spiderman first sided with Tony and followed the act, who would order all superheroes to reveal their secret identity, by unmasking himself in public, which lead to the kingpin trying to assassinate Spidey, just to shoot aunt may instead, leading to one of the worst marvel comics ever printed, One More Day (shudder)

They based the movie very loosely on these events

(Also felt like the movie was trying to point out that she was very attractive. And of course that's personal preference, but... she was higher on the hotness scale than myself, I have no problem of admitting. By far. But I don't think she's a knock-out beauty or anything. And to then have so many men wanting to 'be with her' and it being pointed out again and again, was a bit strange.)
But the story was good, and the male lead as well.

On a related front:  The Red Sparrow

A selection of short scenes and scenarios showcasing Jennifer Lawrence acting extraordinarily hot and sexy held together with a video game type plot that fails to create a meaningful premise. 

A twist in the similarity to your film is that I've seen Lawrence doing scenes acting hot and sexy, and she can do it well when it's part of the plot, rather than just being "the plot."  It's not as titillating when the movie screams at the audience, "See Jennifer Lawrence be a deadly sexy undercover spy, who beats up guys that get in her way."

Like a female James Bond, she moves about the world.  You are never sure why she went to this or that country or place other than to be hot and sexy in a slightly different environment.  It's like someone showing you pictures of their trip to Europe:  "Here's my wife June in front of the British Parliament.  Here's June at Stonehenge.  Here she is in Poland.  Here she is buying sausage from a street vendor.  Here she is at Mount Rushmore.  Oops, I'll have to remember to put that one back with our pictures from when we went to the American West.  Here she is standing in front of a river.  I can't remember what river.  Oh wait, that's also from our trip out west."

I saw half of Red Sparrow at the theater.  I was so bored I walked out.  I felt funny about walking out.  I was sure people were thinking, "He must be some old Puritan freaked out by sex and violence,"  when really, I just got bored and thought I would rather have some French fries and a coke at Burger King if I could find one.

Sometimes sex just doesn't work in a movie if the elements don't come together in ways that make sense.

The whole premise of Civil War is absurd. The Avengers stopped an interstellar invasion of Earth while NOT nuking New York. They stopped an ELE. Etc. And they're considered dangerous because of this. It was a committee that decided to nuke New York. Now they want to put another committee in direct charge of the "enhanced individuals". 'Cause that always works out so well.