News:

Welcome to our site!

Main Menu

Why is Suicide so bad?

Started by dtq123, December 29, 2014, 11:26:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mike Cl

Quote from: dtq123 on December 31, 2014, 12:15:30 AM
Playing devil's advocate here, if suicide an honorable way to die, then why do many people hold on to their lives when they reach a terminal state?

It's kind of weird to have people not want end their own lives, but stay alive and suffer further.


That is not 'weird' at all.  There are a myriad reasons why someone would cling to life.  They may harbor hope (whether it be realistic or not) they will get better.  They may have been brainwashed into believing that if they don't cling to life they will not get to heaven.  Those that cling to life 'want' to for whatever reason.  There are those who are tired of clinging to life and want to end it.  Why would that not be 'honorable'?  Honor should have no part in this.  In many societies it is the 'honorable' thing to commit suicide (WWII Japanese military for example--jihad bombers for another); but for me death is death.  Honor will get you nothing.  When you die you die--what others think of that is up to them. 

From another angle, why do we put our pets to sleep as apposed to letting them live to the bitter end, suffering and in pain?   For me the moral thing (and honorable thing) is to end my furry child's life when there is little to no hope of recovery.  I visited this issue up close and personal just last week (Merry Christmas to me) and had to put to sleep one of my beautiful little dogs whom I had counted on living another 5 years.  A brain tumor made that impossible--we could have done exrays and stuff like that to pinpoint what the exact problem was--but here suffering and pain was so great that that was not the right thing for her.  So instead of trying to make me fell better, I had to look at it from her angle.  She had lived a full life  and even though she will be very deeply missed, allowing her to suffer was not an option.  In many cases, suicide is honorable; at least in my world view. 

It is really nobodies business, other than mine, what I do with my life or when it ends.  Yes, I effect others; but I am the one feeling whatever feelings I have--and to live with pain and no hope of recovery is not living.  My moral values say I have the right to end my life when I deem it necessary. 
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?<br />Then he is not omnipotent,<br />Is he able but not willing?<br />Then whence cometh evil?<br />Is he neither able or willing?<br />Then why call him god?

MagetheEntertainer

I've always found it ironic that its considered more "noble" to be killed then commit suicide, yet its less noble to get fired from a job, then to quit.  Why is that?

dtq123

Quote from: MagetheEntertainer on January 10, 2015, 09:55:34 PM
Yet it's less noble to get fired from a job, then to quit.  Why is that?

Are you saying that people would rather be fired? I can't tell.
Anyway, I'd say otherwise.
Leaving is faster that being fired, and I don't want to have to say I got kicked out of a company for incompetence.
A dark cloud looms over.
Festive cheer does not help much.
What is this, "Justice?"

Aletheia

All the emotional baggage aside - committing suicide is frowned upon mostly for all the debt and paperwork that is left behind. Few, if any life insurance will cover you if you commit suicide.

Personally, I think that if a middle ground could be met to address the financial issues, then suicide would be more likely to be accepted in society - particularly American society. For instance, if you are diagnosed with a terminal illness that is verified, then your insurance should offer to cover you. Your medical insurance could cover the (much cheaper) cost of assisted suicide, while your life insurance covers the cost of your funeral (with proof of assisted suicide - if they choose to force the issue) and leave your family with whatever amount was due in accordance to the terms of the insurance. I suspect a ton of hurdles will be thrown in to make "legal" suicide difficult, but would dangle the carrot of your debts paid (or mostly so) and your family receiving something from the life insurance. Yes, some people who commit suicide are assholes and don't care about the damage left behind in their wake. Other people, however, do worry how their loved ones will carry on in their absence.

A person is entitled to terminate their life at any time, for any reason or no reason at all. All that a society can do is interfere with the methods available to someone who is suicidal and alter the ways in which the consequences from their death are covered (or not).

Quote from: Jakenessif you believe in the supernatural, you do not understand modern science. Period.

Mermaid

#19
Quote from: Aletheia on January 11, 2015, 02:26:08 AM
All the emotional baggage aside - committing suicide is frowned upon mostly for all the debt and paperwork that is left behind. Few, if any life insurance will cover you if you commit suicide.

I can't agree with this. Suicide is "frowned upon" because it often ends the life of a person that people love, sometimes a very young person with a skewed perspective on things. A person with an illness that can heal. Fuck paperwork. If someone in my family killed themselves, paperwork would be the last thing I cared about.
QuoteAll that a society can do is interfere with the methods available to someone who is suicidal and alter the ways in which the consequences from their death are covered (or not).
All that society can do is interfere? I also disagree with this. We can offer help and provide the healthcare and emotional support.
A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticise work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life’s realities â€" all these are marks, not as the possessor would fain to think, of superiority but of weakness. -TR

Aletheia

Quote from: Mermaid on January 11, 2015, 08:57:27 AM
I can't agree with this. Suicide is "frowned upon" because it often ends the life of a person that people love, sometimes a very young person with a skewed perspective on things. A person with an illness that can heal. Fuck paperwork. If someone in my family killed themselves, paperwork would be the last thing I cared about. All that society can do is interfere? I also disagree with this. We can offer help and provide the healthcare and emotional support.

One has to wonder if the feelings of the suicidal individual are taken into account here?

A person who is loved decides to commit suicide. Why should everyone who "loved" them be interfering in what they want to do with their life? We hear all too often that you should do what you want to do with your life and pay no mind to what other people may think. The moment you decide you want to end your life, now you're suddenly selfish? Yes, it's painful for someone to die -- for any reason. Yet, the life of a person has always been their possession to do with as they please. They can live their life the way they choose, and they can end it if they choose to do so. All "loved" ones can do is make a request that a suicidal individual not take their life, but despite all the emotional turmoil, it ultimately is not the "loved" ones' choice to make.

The paperwork aspect isn't pertaining to the loved ones as they are in the midst of their grief. It is in reference to the loved ones who are left tending to the obligations of the deceased - particularly financial debt. Yes, grief is a horrible thing, and I am not undermining that. However, the fact that no life insurance will cover the medical expenses or leave a lump sum for the survivors, is what makes suicide all the more stigmatized. That is where most of the "selfish" part comes from. Not only does a person choose to end their life against the wishes of their loved ones, but the loved ones are left in the wake of what often is financial ruin due to the way the laws are set up.

Yes, help, healthcare, and emotional support are wonderful things for those who are mentally ill or were looking for a solution to their problem. However, for those who legitimately want to die, it is interference. For example, when one of my uncles was diagnosed with terminal cancer, there was no way his family could afford the treatment, hospital stays, or the loss of his wages. His family was the type to hold on no matter what and much like you, demanded that he hold on so that they may have have his company for as long as possible. He was not a foolish man. He knew that our society will not cover his death in the event of suicide. So, he was left with a very excruciating option - refusing treatment. He paid for the doctor visit that diagnosed him with terminal cancer, and went home to die. His family considered him "spending his remaining days with family," but in reality, it was slow, legal suicide. He could've left this world painless, but instead, he left it in utter agony. What will help, healthcare, and emotional support do for a man who was in excruciating pain for months due to a terminal illness? It's pointless at best and indescribably cruel at worst.

I understand the compulsion to want to fight for our loved ones. However, there are times when suicide is the best option. Alter the laws to take care of the loved ones after an individual commits suicide, and you will have fewer people living in utter misery because they feel compelled by the same love do not want to leave behind misery for others.

Not everyone considers life to be worth living, and it is their right to check out early if they so please.

Believe me, I've had enough friends and family commit suicide to have seen things from both sides. I saw the agony of the suicidal individual and I witness the piles and piles of responsibility placed on them by well meaning people. I've seen the unintended selfishness of the loved ones as they literally demand that the suicidal individual stay alive for the sake of them, albeit, dressed up in much prettier words. It's all the same. People do not want a suicidal individual dying because of how they will be affected - emotionally, financially, etc. Rarely does anyone take into consideration the misery of the suicidal individual who find living to be agonizing.

Please do not make the mistake of thinking every suicidal individual is mentally ill. Many are very much in control of their faculties and simply do not wish to live any more.
Quote from: Jakenessif you believe in the supernatural, you do not understand modern science. Period.

dtq123

Quote from: Aletheia on January 11, 2015, 09:17:06 PM
Please do not make the mistake of thinking every suicidal individual is mentally ill.

I don't believe anyone mentioned that, but otherwise it felt very comforting.
Having someone acknowledge this with such complexity gives me ease. In this world of ignorant individuals who are blinded with lies, it gives me ease to talk about topics like this. Just want to say in advance; Everyone, thank you for discussing these ideas. I hope you will put them to the test IRL as well, but this was better than nothing. I wanted nothing more than understanding within this world.

Thanks to all of you I have a bit of hope in humanity left in me, and helped me out of a bad state when my grandmother had insulin shock.

Hope this lasts a bit longer, and if it does Thank you for posting in advance.
A dark cloud looms over.
Festive cheer does not help much.
What is this, "Justice?"

Mike Cl

Quote from: Aletheia on January 11, 2015, 09:17:06 PM
One has to wonder if the feelings of the suicidal individual are taken into account here?

A person who is loved decides to commit suicide. Why should everyone who "loved" them be interfering in what they want to do with their life? We hear all too often that you should do what you want to do with your life and pay no mind to what other people may think. The moment you decide you want to end your life, now you're suddenly selfish? Yes, it's painful for someone to die -- for any reason. Yet, the life of a person has always been their possession to do with as they please. They can live their life the way they choose, and they can end it if they choose to do so. All "loved" ones can do is make a request that a suicidal individual not take their life, but despite all the emotional turmoil, it ultimately is not the "loved" ones' choice to make.

Not everyone considers life to be worth living, and it is their right to check out early if they so please.

Believe me, I've had enough friends and family commit suicide to have seen things from both sides. I saw the agony of the suicidal individual and I witness the piles and piles of responsibility placed on them by well meaning people. I've seen the unintended selfishness of the loved ones as they literally demand that the suicidal individual stay alive for the sake of them, albeit, dressed up in much prettier words. It's all the same. People do not want a suicidal individual dying because of how they will be affected - emotionally, financially, etc. Rarely does anyone take into consideration the misery of the suicidal individual who find living to be agonizing.

Please do not make the mistake of thinking every suicidal individual is mentally ill. Many are very much in control of their faculties and simply do not wish to live any more.
I agree with and endorse everything you said here!  My father killed himself (as stated before) and my mother would have if need be.  For the last 30 yrs of her life she was an insulin taking diabetic.  She was diagnosed with stage 4 ovarian cancer and 6 mo. later died.  He doctor put her mind at ease by explaining to her something she already knew.  He told her not to take too much insulin at once for she could then go into insulin shock and die quickly.  She was going to apply to the Oregon govt for the ability to have a doc. assisted death, if she wanted it.  After the doc. left, she figured she would not need to worry.  She kept at least 3 times what she needed at all times.  But as fortune had it, she had a crisis, went to the ER, and died within 2 days.  She was emotionally comforted knowing that she would not linger in horrid pain.  Nobody should have to go through horrid and lingering pain because our society is too cruel to allow people to pass in their own way and time.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?<br />Then he is not omnipotent,<br />Is he able but not willing?<br />Then whence cometh evil?<br />Is he neither able or willing?<br />Then why call him god?