Eyewitness is about as low on the list of credible sources as it gets
Sure, if it's just one or two.
In this case there are thousands, to which you can apply statistics*. Which they didn't. Why not? Because it would have shown what they didn't want to be public knowledge?
*a bona fide
scientific tool
so... aight, cool story that they were there bro.
Yep, they can tell their grandchildren they were there when the administration murdered three thousand of its own citizens* in order to have an excuse to start 2 wars that cost 80.000 more American lives, and over a million of non-Americans'. All for the benefit of the already filthy rich super shareholders – read: owners – of the military, energy, and finance industries. The multi billionaires.
Money rules in America.
Not the people.
The Supreme Court locked that down once more for good measure this week (
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/us/politics/supreme-court-ruling-on-campaign-contributions.html?_r=0).
* a socalled 'false flag operation'. A classic in politics and war for millennia. Hitler did it with Poland (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident). Putin is doing it, as we speak, in the Ukraine**. The US did it in Vietnam (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Incident). 9/11 Was an updated version of the '
Operation Northwoods' scenario of the early sixties.
**odds are – well, not exactly odds of course; actually just following convention – this may henceforth go down in history as 'the Lugansk Incident'...
Watch the news. The excuse for Putin to go in 'to protect our Russian brethren from being attacked by the Kiev regime – those NATO lovers!' is developing in Lugansk right now. The timers seem to be set for 48 hours from now.
And when the dust has settled Putin will have the Crimea and the north-eastern Ukraine (= huge) back into the Russian (feudal/imperial/communist/fascist) fold/realm.
And a taste for more where that came from.
The multi-billionaires
love it.