Political Correctness

[Kibla92]

He kinda makes a point there. Beware of the tricksters.


But for sake of argument. Kanye vs Trump 2020. Kanye wins. Just to end it once and for all. And then make it normalized on the intention of policy focus than identity card (you may be confused, well what about Obama? The whole idea is to get it off Democrats is my problem, they usually sell this as a thing than policies and legit problems, Kanye is its own independent party).

But i dunno. Just problem is people who have sexuality as a hobby kind of have to push people who dont normally care about it. Opinion policing online i see lots of time atleast.
- Expressing like this = bad

Just to mention few things. So it is easy to get annoyed by people who have sexuality as a hobby. One thing is being just this, one thing is to annoy people. Should be a civil rights movement is my problem, civil rights for it is fine. But its why i am anti LGBT, its mainly a political tool.

But curious to your views?

[Mike Cl]

I haven't a clue what it is you are rambling on about.  The only part I got was you are anti-gay, because it is only a political tool???  You aren't the sharpest tack in the box, are you?

[Baruch]

That was pretty confused.  Let me respond on a different level.  Government is a legalized protection business.  Same as Mafia, but legitimized by political authority.  If we are speaking of political correctness, we aren't talking about traditional mores ... such as don't discuss sex, politics or religion in public.  Or don't go outside without any clothes on ;-)  Basically it is a new pressure tactic.  You conform culturally the way I want or you and your family "gets it".  Demands in the US by BLM for Whites to kneel, are an example of informal political correctness, by violent gangs.  When a government engages in this kind of protection (as opposed to ... pay your taxes or your family "gets it") ... that is a new angle on tyranny.  All government is official tyranny (and perhaps necessary for civilization) but private protection rackets are unofficial tyranny (and perhaps unnecessary for civilization).

From an American perspective, this is particularly obnoxious tyranny, but back in the day when the Freedom Of The Press only belonged to The Press ... it was easy for the government to regulate ... and apply protection rackets to the Press.  With the Internet, this has been blown apart in an unprecedented way.  Now anyone can be The Press!  This makes it much harder for control to be exerted by the government and its sub-organs (such as political parties).  Thus the modern period of Political Correctness has come about in the 21st century.

Doesn't matter what the point of correctness is ... the point is, that if you have an individual or group that you want to coerce, you find a pressure point ala karate, and threaten to apply pressure to it.  In fact, low level execution of pressure, is necessary for people to accept its reality.  Threat isn't sufficient, but that is applied too, in select cases (Wikileaks) ... "as a warning to others" ... capiche?



In Sicilian Mafia this is called, Omertà = Sicilian for "humility" aka don't be a rat.  PC is "Omertà" via official government organs.  I don't agree with the comic.  In Sicily, he would have been told to stop, one time.



Of course, every tribe has official and unofficial gangs.  The typical danger of Islam is it is one huge merciless gang.

[trdsf]

Sexuality as a hobby?  What the everlasting Technicolor fuck are you talking about?

[drunkenshoe]

Nothing new, it seems like he/she is trying not to sound too blatant in an atheist forum,lol. But then a religious person questioning 'political correctness' in this or any context is a laughing matter in itself. The ability of compartmentalisation in these groups is scarier than Korean horror movies.

I think he/she means that making LGBTQ+ rights (also racial identities...etc) a civil rights issue is nothing but a political tool because it is not a legitimate, real problem. A lot of people don't care or want to hear about it so why this is an issue at all? Esp. if you're anti-gay and racist and don't want to hear about it. After all, it is OK for these groupds out there because it is better than the barbaric conditions they lived before.

"Sexuality as a hobby" highly likely comes from the same idea as these people cannot comprehend the concept to begin with and obviously, if you're promoting, working for these issues, this is a 'sexual hobby' you have,lol. Because for example, you 'choose' to be gay. Or if he gets it, maybe 'why dont you live with your perversity in the shadows in silence' kind of logic?

As you all know, like Christian communites, almost all the Muslim communities claim that LGBTQ+ communities are fundamentally 'harmful' to societies in every sense. The modern 'sexual immorality' is obviously caused by LGBTQ+ groups and feminist sluts,lol. 

[Baruch]

No, non-traditional behavior is caused by modernity.  Which will be eliminated in post-modernity ... which can only mean a return to pre-modernity.

[Kibla92]

Nothing new, it seems like he/she is trying not to sound too blatant in an atheist forum,lol. But then a religious person questioning 'political correctness' in this or any context is a laughing matter in itself. The ability of compartmentalisation in these groups is scarier than Korean horror movies.

I think he/she means that making LGBTQ+ rights (also racial identities...etc) a civil rights issue is nothing but a political tool because it is not a legitimate, real problem. A lot of people don't care or want to hear about it so why this is an issue at all? Esp. if you're anti-gay and racist and don't want to hear about it. After all, it is OK for these groupds out there because it is better than the barbaric conditions they lived before.

"Sexuality as a hobby" highly likely comes from the same idea as these people cannot comprehend the concept to begin with and obviously, if you're promoting, working for these issues, this is a 'sexual hobby' you have,lol. Because for example, you 'choose' to be gay. Or if he gets it, maybe 'why dont you live with your perversity in the shadows in silence' kind of logic?

As you all know, like Christian communites, almost all the Muslim communities claim that LGBTQ+ communities are fundamentally 'harmful' to societies in every sense. The modern 'sexual immorality' is obviously caused by LGBTQ+ groups and feminist sluts,lol.

You are speaking from a leftist echo chamber view point and assume thats what i think

If you like girls or boys "depending on your gender.. then you are straight, gay whatever) thats just what you are. But if you have a chat group.. where that is all you talk about. Then its a hobby pure and simple, i mean you get the option of reading, studying or watching a cool movie.. or you can do something legit boring and talk about your sexuality 24/7... absolute worth it lol. Thats what i label sexuality as a hobby, unlike being who you are which is just your sexuality.

Also i dont believe gay is a choice either, but it isnt born either. Those are just talking point from religious/politicial activist wackos.

Scientifically you are born with a spectrum. The funny thing is if you trick your mindset you can be attracted to whatever if it works for your mindset. You arent magnetized is what i mean. Like you arent born a horse lover "which is illegal for good reason" point is you are born with a mental state. Thats what you are born with. Left wingers or right wingers who try to convince something that isnt there is so laughable to me

As if i believe gays are harmful. No. But i do believe degeneracy is harmful. Mental deficiency (thats a culture issue more or less). If anything only harmful thing with male on male homosexuality is Anal sex has high risk of AIDS. If it was me i would have warning label in Anal Sex porn or something along side that. Just like Smoking is warned of high risk of Lung Cancer. So should Anal sex be warned about for high risk of AIDS. Unless people think its cool for males to die though

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/analsex.html
Anal sex is the highest-risk sexual behavior for HIV transmission. Vaginal sex has a lower risk, and activities like oral sex, touching, and kissing carry little to no risk for getting or transmitting HIV. The vast majority of men who get HIV get it through anal sex. However, anal sex is also one of the ways women can get HIV.

[aitm]

“Also i dont believe gay is a choice either, but it isnt born either“

You should try reading a little about it. You know, educate yourself before you embarrass yourself. 1 out of every 1000 children +/- are born with both male and female genitalia to varying degrees. This alone destroys your ignorance of, “but it isn’t born either”. Can you tell me which sex is a first born infant who has both an Inney and an outey? No, nor can actual doctors who may specialize in it -hint: no one really specializes in it, nor can anyone. The child will not develop a sexual identity for many years. But the doctor whacks off the outey or sews up the inney, and proclaims “voila! A girl!” Your ignorance suggests the child will automatically become a girl because she has an inney.
Really, your ignorance is not stunning, but it is typical. If physical androgyny exists so does psychological ( for lack of the more precise word) androgyny. Seriously, educate yourself before you prove you’re an idiot.

[aitm]

You may want to google Anne Fausto-Sterling. She is a pretty good expert on sexual androgyny.

[Kibla92]

“Also i dont believe gay is a choice either, but it isnt born either“

You should try reading a little about it. You know, educate yourself before you embarrass yourself. 1 out of every 1000 children +/- are born with both male and female genitalia to varying degrees. This alone destroys your ignorance of, “but it isn’t born either”. Can you tell me which sex is a first born infant who has both an Inney and an outey? No, nor can actual doctors who may specialize in it -hint: no one really specializes in it, nor can anyone. The child will not develop a sexual identity for many years. But the doctor whacks off the outey or sews up the inney, and proclaims “voila! A girl!” Your ignorance suggests the child will automatically become a girl because she has an inney.
Really, your ignorance is not stunning, but it is typical. If physical androgyny exists so does psychological ( for lack of the more precise word) androgyny. Seriously, educate yourself before you prove you’re an idiot.

You are born as you. Thats the reality of it. Some like shooters video games, some dont. Thats the answer

If you refer to transsexualism, i just label that stupid roleplaying. Because all you do is taking your fantasy into reality and ruining functional organs for sake of it. As a kid i wanted to be Simba from Lion King.. that doesnt mean i should actually remove what aint broken. Since transsexualism i just consider real life roleplaying that people take too far.

But if you are above 18, then its your life. But it should be criminal for people doing it to kids. Thats child abuse.

[Mike Cl]

You are speaking from a leftist echo chamber view point and assume thats what i think

If you like girls or boys "depending on your gender.. then you are straight, gay whatever) thats just what you are. But if you have a chat group.. where that is all you talk about. Then its a hobby pure and simple, i mean you get the option of reading, studying or watching a cool movie.. or you can do something legit boring and talk about your sexuality 24/7... absolute worth it lol. Thats what i label sexuality as a hobby, unlike being who you are which is just your sexuality.

Also i dont believe gay is a choice either, but it isnt born either. Those are just talking point from religious/politicial activist wackos.

Scientifically you are born with a spectrum. The funny thing is if you trick your mindset you can be attracted to whatever if it works for your mindset. You arent magnetized is what i mean. Like you arent born a horse lover "which is illegal for good reason" point is you are born with a mental state. Thats what you are born with. Left wingers or right wingers who try to convince something that isnt there is so laughable to me

As if i believe gays are harmful. No. But i do believe degeneracy is harmful. Mental deficiency (thats a culture issue more or less). If anything only harmful thing with male on male homosexuality is Anal sex has high risk of AIDS. If it was me i would have warning label in Anal Sex porn or something along side that. Just like Smoking is warned of high risk of Lung Cancer. So should Anal sex be warned about for high risk of AIDS. Unless people think its cool for males to die though

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/analsex.html
Anal sex is the highest-risk sexual behavior for HIV transmission. Vaginal sex has a lower risk, and activities like oral sex, touching, and kissing carry little to no risk for getting or transmitting HIV. The vast majority of men who get HIV get it through anal sex. However, anal sex is also one of the ways women can get HIV.

Well, I'll be damned.  You are religious.  I'd guess Muslim; but it matters not, for you are displaying a rotten mind.  Or no mind at all.

[Baruch]

Medical transsexualism or hermaphroditism are complicated, real and rare.  In UK there is a push for Identity Politics Transsexualism, that isn't a medical condition but an attempt for big hairy men to intrude in the women's restroom as a part of their Left politics (ironically not something that should be considered a virtue signal).

All sex is highly dangerous, particularly the heterosexual kind vis-à-vis pregnancy.  My favorite warning sign would be one on the forehead that says Nobody At Home ;-)

One doesn't decide how to be born, but one is responsible for how you act out who you are.  So in the first case the Right is wrong, and in the second case the Left is wrong.  False dichotomy means you are being played by the Elite (who all act like Caligula).

[Draconic Aiur]

Troll spotted.

[Cassia]

After such insightful posts, it is a reverse miracle that all atheists didn't convert immediately.

[Blackleaf]

I don't think he's a troll. He may be religious, but I'm not going to jump to that conclusion either. I think he's just another one of those Alt-Righter types, who thinks blue-haired college kids are the worst threat in the modern world.