One would have to accept the OT as factual to proclaim what you suggest. The OT even if could be proven true does not show such grand mass scale “murder” as suggested. Remember this is sill a remote part of the world comparatively, millions at that time didn’t even know the existence of the rest of the world. Jewish ego aside, “gods chosen people”,=the reality of the OT shows god was not particularly effective in their own region and decidedly impotent to the rest of the world.
Your suggestion that they are similar to the Nazis is rather a telling view on how you place Judaism as a great and powerful religion while that simply is not the case. Perhaps you are choosing to make Judaism larger than it is.
That all, said, it is well known that if one wished to spend the time, and I imagine someone already has, due to ego, one would find that “per capita” the Jewish people has and rather large lead over other religions in practically all science, technology, arts and most other subjects.
Invasion of the Sea Peoples ... war wasn't just for sailors, but landlubbers too. Even earlier if you count the Hyksos as Semites, they count as proto-Jews.
The prequel to the Bible ...
Where historical Israel came from, and the context ...
Per the OT, the Philistines were war like and had iron tools/weapons. Israelites had to trade with them to get iron tools (iron plow blades would have been particularly useful in their rocky soil). The rise of the initial Israel Kingdom was to defeat the Philistines and to be able to make their own iron implements. Famously, David was a shepherd who only had sling stones. Only a king had proper armor and weapons, like Saul.
The success of the later Neo-Assyrian Empire, led to the adoption of the Aramaic alphabet and language for state records, cuneiform being relegated to the scholarly. Persia conquered Assyria, and adopted this same state tool (Aramaic). Persian control and later Greek control of Mesopotamia, led to the eventual eclipse of cuneiform, Babylonian and Assyrian. Greek was then the administrative language under Alexander and his successors, until the coming of the Islamic hordes, and Quranic Arabic took its place.
Meanwhile, Hebrew became eclipsed by Aramaic also, becoming a scholarly language during the Roman period. But the NT was composed in Greek by Hellenistic Jews.
Primary sources, mentioning the Apiru and Shosu ... from the reign of monotheist, Pharaoh Akhenaton.
This older lecture ... fails to mention that Hebrew = Canaanite/Ugaritic. Amorites = Hyksos. Byblos = Bible.
This had a cultural impact, thru the Moses faction (Kohens and Levites) who had no tribal territory in Israel. The Bible of course came much later, is an anthology, is like a Hollywood movie (based on real events) haha. Modern versions like Prince of Egypt animation, is a Hollywood movie based on a real book.
