Firstly, we have a question?
Is the universe in an organized order, or is it a chaos?
Cosmos in its etymological root means order, in contrast to any order or organization...
So, you agree with that the universe is going where it is going in an organized order??????????????
or it is a chaos?????şdlfjgldfgd?_?????????*
Asking the thread's headline's question? what do you think?
It is very popular rhetoric in Turkland's some circles...
The answers are in Greek ... is it Greek to you?
The world was a "chaos" but became a "cosmos" ... from disorder to order. To an ancient Greek that meant acquiring a personality. Even in quantum probability, there is order within it. Even within classical turbulence, there is order within it. This went from a mythology, to a natural philosophy, under Thales and Pythagoras. Heraclitus focused on chaos, Xenophanes focused on monotheism (or at least henotheism). It is anthropomorphic, to say that nature requires a personality (aka Gaia/Uranus coupling). Specifically Chaos was like the quantum vacuum, a void out of which all things come. By spontaneous generation, the first gods were formed ... Gaia, Tartarus, Eros, Erebus, Hemera and Nyx. It is unclear if Uranus came directly from Gaia or indirectly from Aether + Gaia, where Aether is the son of Erebus + Nyx, with Hemera not primordial but the brother of Aether. Each of these is a personification of some primary human experience/idea. One can see how monotheism was an obvious improvement ;-) It took millennia for natural philosophy to turn into physical science. But materialism and rationalism date back almost as far as classical mythology (the version we know from literate Greece).
It is Aristotelian (and therefore Averroist/Muslim) to insist on a cause of nature that isn't infinite regression. The problem of a non-infinite regression was a problem for natural philosophy and physical science, until the Big Bang was discovered. The cosmologist went right back to the beginning and found the theologians were already there ;-) Aristotle had to posit a Prime Mover to avoid infinite regression non-theistically.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_causesAristotle did his philosophical work thru careful analysis of the Greek language. But it isn't a complete travesty to do this in a non-Greek language like English ;-))