Author Topic: OBAMACARE MANDATE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL  (Read 166 times)

Offline Baruch

OBAMACARE MANDATE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL
« on: December 20, 2019, 08:24:35 AM »
Roberts court, ruled this a tax, and because of the tax mandate, the whole ACA was ruled constitutional.  Now that Trump removed the tax mandate, this led to state level challenges to the whole ACA.  And SCOTUS just agreed.

Yes, bring us FREE Medicare For All?  My mom paid United Health Care $200 month to handle the Medicare paperwork.  Not free.
Zampa xiquihto.  Amo nimitzcuamachilia.
Say it again.  I don't understand you.

Re: OBAMACARE MANDATE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2020, 02:43:53 PM »
Congress never made health care or health insurance affordable. So having a mandate to have insurance was an act of tyranny.... and the new mandate in California is also an act of tyranny.

There are some good things in the Affordable Care Act, but it was never intended to make health care affordable. Only a Congressional dumb-ass with a good pipe would think that it does.
not expecting god to show up, but if he does we’re going to have to beat the prick up.

Re: OBAMACARE MANDATE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2020, 03:44:50 PM »
Ah, a program thought up by a Republican is unconstitutional. Sounds right.
We 'new atheists' have a reputation for being militant, but make no mistake  we didn't start this war. If you want to place blame put it on the the religious zealots who have been poisoning the minds of the  young for a long long time."
PZ Myers

Offline SGOS

Re: OBAMACARE MANDATE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2020, 07:18:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
There are some good things in the Affordable Care Act, but it was never intended to make health care affordable. Only a Congressional dumb-ass with a good pipe would think that it does.
Create an act and give it a name that makes it sound like it does exactly the opposite of what it does, and it will appeal to more people.  I first noticed this tactic when I had been following the Forest Services' tactics in the 1990s, such as cooking the books and falsifying inventories.  There was a bill called the Forest Health and Restoration Act put out by the Bush Administration in 2003, and was written by timber companies.  It called for more logging and excluding logging sales up to 1000 acres from required environmental assessments.  Basically saving the forests by getting rid of the trees.  But "the Ninth Circuit held that the Forest Service's promulgation of the categorical exclusion "was arbitrary and capricious".   After that I started noticing this tactic on other bills, titled with obviously misleading names. 

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Offline Baruch

Re: OBAMACARE MANDATE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2020, 10:06:22 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Congress never made health care or health insurance affordable. So having a mandate to have insurance was an act of tyranny.... and the new mandate in California is also an act of tyranny.

There are some good things in the Affordable Care Act, but it was never intended to make health care affordable. Only a Congressional dumb-ass with a good pipe would think that it does.

Name politicians put on a bill.  It is really the opposite.  If a bill is named "Candy For All" you can bet psycho dentists lobbied for it -)
Zampa xiquihto.  Amo nimitzcuamachilia.
Say it again.  I don't understand you.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk