Milkshakes a deadly weapon.

[Munch]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

according to someone here.

I would have been upset if they wasted chocolate milkshake.

[Baruch]

Sargon is the political equivalent of an Internet troll.

Clownworld, with bike locks.

[Unbeliever]

Plenty more milkshakes where that one came from.

[Sal1981]

Good thing Count Dankula wasn't attacked with a milkshake...

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

[Baruch]

Good thing Count Dankula wasn't attacked with a milkshake...

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

I like the good old days.  You insult someone, they hit you in the face.

[Munch]

I like the good old days.  You insult someone, they hit you in the face.

Didn't they use gloves though?

[Baruch]

Didn't they use gloves though?

Toffs might hit you with their white gloves ;-)  Not boxing gloves though.

[Unbeliever]

Boxing gloves aren't meant to protect the face getting hit, but the hands doing the hitting.

[Hijiri Byakuren]

Pff, guy was clearly leading them on. How could you lay eyes on such a punchable face and not take a swing at it? :P

[SvZurich]

What a waste of a perfectly good shake.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Draconic Aiur]

Weird.

[Cavebear]

I don't mind the waste of a chocolate milkshake.  A vanilla with almond extract one, maybe. 

But I think the real point is "How do you attack a powerful idiot without getting in serious legal trouble?".  Inventive ways may be the future of protests.

[Munch]

I don't mind the waste of a chocolate milkshake.  A vanilla with almond extract one, maybe. 

But I think the real point is "How do you attack a powerful idiot without getting in serious legal trouble?".  Inventive ways may be the future of protests.

So I assume you missed the video Baruch put up the other day talking about how even if you disagree with what someone says politically, they still deserve the right to speak and not get attacked physically or silenced just because you don't like it, because doing so would be disallowing anyone else to come to their own conclusions about what the guy is saying?

[Baruch]

I don't mind the waste of a chocolate milkshake.  A vanilla with almond extract one, maybe. 

But I think the real point is "How do you attack a powerful idiot without getting in serious legal trouble?".  Inventive ways may be the future of protests.

Enjoy your sit-in at the Dean's office, hippie ;-)

[Cavebear]

So I assume you missed the video Baruch put up the other day talking about how even if you disagree with what someone says politically, they still deserve the right to speak and not get attacked physically or silenced just because you don't like it, because doing so would be disallowing anyone else to come to their own conclusions about what the guy is saying?

I was referring to the way Trump attacks people for expressing reasonable points of view by belittling their character instead of addressing the views they expressed.  That is standard authoritarian demagoguery.