The United World State has founded in Turkland...It's a digital state...

Started by SoldierofFortune, February 11, 2019, 04:37:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Baruch

Quote from: Unbeliever on February 16, 2019, 06:42:29 PM
The moon doesn't really exist - it's a Chinese hoax...

it wouldn't be made of green cheese if it had been property refrigerated ;-)
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

Baruch

Quote from: SoldierofFortune on February 16, 2019, 07:27:52 PM
It is said that the Moon and The Gulen movement are very similar in the way they organize.
By the way, the way by which the society organize are by sects or say by communities...

Authoritarians always fear bottom up organizations, it is democratic.

Moon = showing your naked butt at authority as a sign of disrespect.  Like in ME, throwing your shoes at them.
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

Hydra009

Quote from: SoldierofFortune on February 16, 2019, 03:28:16 PM
Sooner or later, a world federation will be founded.


Truly, a terrible day for mankind.

Who will nationalists war with now?

SoldierofFortune

Quote from: Hydra009 on February 16, 2019, 11:01:42 PM


Truly, a terrible day for mankind.

Who will nationalists war with now?

Nationalism will be threw in to the garbage of history...
Believe me, soon(soon enough in the historical time scale) there will be no nation in terms of their genetic make-ups...
why do you think the 2019 and the following years will be the years of homo activists?
there are besides more aspects of it...

Hydra009

Quote from: SoldierofFortune on February 16, 2019, 11:45:41 PMwhy do you think the 2019 and the following years will be the years of homo activists?
Wow.  What a statement.  Makes me wonder about the mentality that produced it.

These "homo activists" have been pushing for change for years, decades even, but only gotten change relatively recently and only in a few countries (27 so far).  In those countries, it's a lot less of a big deal as the population has moved on to other issues.  In other countries where they can't legally get married (and sometimes, can't legally exist) it's much more pressing.  So it'd be accurate to say that the issue is (mostly) settled and is far from settled, depending on your point of reference.

drunkenshoe

It's called LGBT activists. They have been active for a long time.

Yes, there always has been an idea about 'the world state'. Other than that, I have no idea what you are talking about. 
"science is not about building a body of known 'facts'. ıt is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check, thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good." - tp

Baruch

Quote from: drunkenshoe on February 17, 2019, 02:54:10 AM
It's called LGBT activists. They have been active for a long time.

Yes, there always has been an idea about 'the world state'. Other than that, I have no idea what you are talking about.

Cyrus, Alexander, Caesar ... previously visited Anatolia to promote their "world state".  But this is today.  If China or the US, try for this megalomania .. nuke them.  We can tolerate a Dark Ages if necessary, to stop this "ant", "bee" or "termite" civilization all of which are matriarchies.
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

Baruch

Quote from: Hydra009 on February 16, 2019, 11:01:42 PM


Truly, a terrible day for mankind.

Who will nationalists war with now?

In the future, all wars are civil wars (which is worse).  Pacifism is a non-starter with our species.  We are predatory.
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

pr126

I am skeptical that one world government would exist for the benefit of mankind.
(Or peoplekind.Thanks, Justin Trudeau).

Where 9 billion (or more) people will be happy and prosperous for evermore.
Rather than just a few on the top of the food chain.
Which has been a natural state of things ever since humans existed.

Be careful what you wish for.


drunkenshoe

If you reduce the world population to one billion, it might stand.

It's about population.   
"science is not about building a body of known 'facts'. ıt is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check, thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good." - tp

pr126

Quote from: drunkenshoe on February 17, 2019, 03:21:04 AM
If you reduce the world population to one billion, it might stand.

It's about population.   
It may yet happen. Agenda 21/2030?

Doesn’t need a war.
Judicious pandemic, aka biological “accident” would do it.
Feasible? I think so.

drunkenshoe

Judicious pandemic? You seem to be delighted by the idea. Is that because you dream that Islamic countries would be affected the most or you just woke up from the Abrahamic side of the bed?

There are people who claim killing the elderly -anyone over 60, also mentally disabled and sick people who needs constant care- would be more pragmatic than random genocide, pr. What do you think about that? If it is to go that way, why would they kill young people? They are strong, healthy, capable. They can be easily shaped and manipulated. Don't you think, this is the most feasible scenario?

Also that's called biological warfare. So, it's an act of war. Genocide.

Why 21/2030 by the way? Is it a special date?
"science is not about building a body of known 'facts'. ıt is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check, thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good." - tp

pr126

Quote from: drunkenshoe on February 17, 2019, 09:36:07 AM
Judicious pandemic? You seem to be delighted by the idea. Is that because you dream that Islamic countries would be affected the most or you just woke up from the Abrahamic side of the bed?

There are people who claim killing the elderly -anyone over 60, also mentally disabled and sick people who needs constant care- would be more pragmatic than random genocide, pr. What do you think about that? If it is to go that way, why would they kill young people? They are strong, healthy, capable. They can be easily shaped and manipulated. Don't you think, this is the most feasible scenario?

Also that's called biological warfare. So, it's an act of war. Genocide.

Why 21/2030 by the way? Is it a special date?

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

Here is a short explanation of Agenda 21.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM

Agenda 2030 is Sustainable development.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2I37RT3TCo


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfMxsrcr1D0

Baruch

Quote from: drunkenshoe on February 17, 2019, 03:21:04 AM
If you reduce the world population to one billion, it might stand.

It's about population.

So lets kill all the people in Africa/Asia?  It is more painful to economically or demographically retrench, than to have moderate expansion.  This is a problem for Europe (where nobody wants to have children, leading to Merkel admitting millions of immigrants) or for China/Japan which are also entering demographic suicide, just later.  India is not as far along.  So if China/Japan becomes a declining middle class lib-tard hell hole, then the surplus Indians can be used to repopulate E Asia, just as Africans/ME folk are being used to repopulate Europe.

Given the SJW=ness of Millennials, I say, kill the under 30 crowd and get f*ing to replace them (sarc).

Actual fact ... there was peace in premodern times in Micronesia.  The tribes were isolated on separate islands, they had no idea of material progress (Yap Island stone money), and the natural environment of fishing and coconuts was sufficient for subsistence (but not Easter Island ... which is very E of even Polynesia).  Polynesia for whatever reason, did have endemic warfare due to overpopulation, which was partly relieved by exporting population to Hawaii and NZ.
Ha’át’íísh baa naniná?
Azee’ Å,a’ish nanídį́į́h?
Táadoo ánít’iní.
What are you doing?
Are you taking any medications?
Don't do that.

drunkenshoe

Quote from: pr126 on February 17, 2019, 11:20:02 AM
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

Agenda 21?! It's not surprising the date doesn't remind me anything in this conversation. It takes a right wing nuts like you to relate a nonbinding UN world development plan with controlled genocide. Those videos do not explain Agenda 21. It's right wing bullshit.

 

"science is not about building a body of known 'facts'. ıt is a method for asking awkward questions and subjecting them to a reality-check, thus avoiding the human tendency to believe whatever makes us feel good." - tp