Author Topic: Old essay, but still relevant ...  (Read 1317 times)

Offline Baruch

Re: Old essay, but still relevant ...
« Reply #30 on: May 22, 2019, 04:01:49 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I wasn't asking to examples of oxymorons, we could be here all day (or all week) listing those.

Oxymorons all the way down.  Not turtles ;-)
πŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽŒπŽ€πŽπŽŽπŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€πŽŸπŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽπŽ€πŽπŽ‰πŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€
luu shalmaata luu balt’aata
May you be well, may you be healthy

Offline aitm

Re: Old essay, but still relevant ...
« Reply #31 on: May 22, 2019, 08:08:02 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Still here, 3000 years later, more or less. 

The point being...to your claim...is that for awhile the Jews were the exterminators of the Jews.
A humans desire to live is exceeded only by their willingness to die for another. Even god cannot equal this magnificent sacrifice. No god has the right to judge them.-first tenant of the Panotheust

Offline Baruch

Re: Old essay, but still relevant ...
« Reply #32 on: May 22, 2019, 11:27:37 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The point being...to your claim...is that for awhile the Jews were the exterminators of the Jews.

I don't know what you mean.  Gentile exterminate Jews.  Jews are not Gentiles.  In Judaism, Jews are holy people, and Gentiles are unholy.  Kosher vs treif.
πŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽŒπŽ€πŽπŽŽπŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€πŽŸπŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽπŽ€πŽπŽ‰πŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€
luu shalmaata luu balt’aata
May you be well, may you be healthy

Offline Cavebear

Re: Old essay, but still relevant ...
« Reply #33 on: May 26, 2019, 08:15:58 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Still here, 3000 years later, more or less.  Can Americans claim that some day?

Iraqis are.  Does that count?  Seriously, they stayed from a city "Uruk" to a nation "Iraq".  Not much of a change.

Atheist born, atheist bred.  And when I die, atheist dead!

Offline Baruch

Re: Old essay, but still relevant ...
« Reply #34 on: May 26, 2019, 10:04:21 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Iraqis are.  Does that count?  Seriously, they stayed from a city "Uruk" to a nation "Iraq".  Not much of a change.

Coincidental naming.  Uruk is Sumerian.  A long dead city.  Iraq derives from Uruk but in Arabic.  Arabic is related to Babylonian ... the Babylonians being the successors to the Sumerians.  Sumerian and Semitic languages are unrelated (Arabic, Babylonian and Hebrew are all Semitic languages).

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The larger Afro-Asiatic language family includes both Semitic and ancient Egyptian languages.

Arabic dialects are the most common modern Semitic language family ... followed by Israeli and then by the Aramiac dialects.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Modern Standard Arabic is shared by educated Arabs, along with their local dialect.  It is based on the Quran.  Israeli is derivative from Biblical Hebrew ... like modern English is derived from Old English.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2019, 02:53:15 PM by Baruch »
πŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽŒπŽ€πŽπŽŽπŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€πŽŸπŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽπŽ€πŽπŽ‰πŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€
luu shalmaata luu balt’aata
May you be well, may you be healthy

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk