That is interesting, because I have always had a tendency to use non-standard word-forms. Insuccessful, unoppertunististic, anything logical word construction permits. Funny story, My senior high school english teacher challenged us to understand 'Jabberwocky' as a study assignment and I stood up and diagrammed it on the board in terms on nouns, verbs, etc on the spot.
He was actually kind of pissed, but the pleasing result was that he told me to just read serious books during class and I was happy to oblige. There were no AP classes then.
Oh, and he had THE WORLD'S GREATEST NAME EVER "Aubrey Wafford Thomas". Pity I never had a child... I would have named a son after him.
I love words where the opposite seems perfectly reasonable, but has disappeared anyway. It seems to me that if you're satisfied with a situation, you're gruntled. If you're not puzzled by a situation, you should be plussed.
I also love sensible additions to the language—I have been known to use 'zarking' and 'belgium!' from Hitchhiker's Guide in place of stronger invective, and my favorite addition is 'cromulent' from The Simpsons because it was so perfectly clear from context exactly what it meant. The great thing about that word is that it fits all the 'rules' about what a word should be like. It naturally lends itself to the extensions we put English words through: you can sensibly speak of something having cromulence, or being presented cromulently.
I puzzled over the antonym for cromulent for a while, because 'uncromulent', 'non-cromulent', 'incromulent' and 'acromulent' are all awkward. The best to me seems to be 'anticromulent'.
