Author Topic: Thoughts About Relativity  (Read 2789 times)

Offline SGOS

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2018, 11:29:07 AM »
Is it possible that GR and QM, or rather the physics that to apply to either, are inconsistent with each other and operate independently?

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2018, 12:31:48 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Is it possible that GR and QM, or rather the physics that to apply to either, are inconsistent with each other and operate independently?

Unlikely.   Since quantum effects overlap with general relativity.   Like at the event horizons of black holes.
Winner of WitchSabrinas Best Advice Award 2012


We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real
tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. -Plato

Offline trdsf

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2018, 02:29:37 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Is it possible that GR and QM, or rather the physics that to apply to either, are inconsistent with each other and operate independently?
Probably not.  GR and QM are only incomplete, not wrong.  Any future theory needs to include both of them, more than it will replace them, in the same way that Newtonian gravity is a low-energy simplification of GR.

Also, we observe the universe to be a unified whole; if there were two different regimes of physics in operation, we would expect to see a discontinuity between regions operating under the different rules.
Sir Terry Pratchett, on being told about the theory that the universe is a computer simulation: "If we all get out and in again, would it start to work properly this time?"

Offline SGOS

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2018, 03:25:17 PM »
It was just a thought.

Offline Baruch

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #19 on: January 29, 2018, 04:02:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It was just a thought.

The ego of intellectuals extend beyond even the multiverse ;-)
πŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽŒπŽ€πŽπŽŽπŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€πŽŸπŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽπŽ€πŽπŽ‰πŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€
luu shalmaata luu balt’aata
May you be well, may you be healthy

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #20 on: January 29, 2018, 04:07:39 PM »
You have an entire multiverse right there in your head, don't you? ;)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"In life, unlike chess, the game continues after checkmate."
Isaac Asimov

Offline trdsf

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #21 on: January 29, 2018, 04:16:03 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It was just a thought.
It's an intelligent question, actuallyβ€”since GR and QM work so fantastically well within their domains, it's fair to wonder whether GR does its own thing, and QM does its own thing, and never the twain shall meet.

It's just that the places they do meet are so extreme, we don't encounter them, except maybe for the briefest fractions of a second in CERN, and that's a 'within the last ten years' thing.
Sir Terry Pratchett, on being told about the theory that the universe is a computer simulation: "If we all get out and in again, would it start to work properly this time?"

Offline Baruch

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #22 on: January 29, 2018, 04:21:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You have an entire multiverse right there in your head, don't you? ;)

Only if you are a multiverse theoretician.  String theorists have quantum strings in their heads ;-)  Horny men have something else in their "heads" ...
πŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽŒπŽ€πŽπŽŽπŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€πŽŸπŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽπŽ€πŽπŽ‰πŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€
luu shalmaata luu balt’aata
May you be well, may you be healthy

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #23 on: January 29, 2018, 04:26:51 PM »
You are the very model of a multiverse phenomenon. :)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"In life, unlike chess, the game continues after checkmate."
Isaac Asimov

Offline Cavebear

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2018, 05:32:03 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
And we never will with that attitude! :p

I got to back up Ursus Major here, just a little -- it's entirely possible, and entirely consistent with the history of scientific advance, that there might not be a final Theory of Everything, just ever better approximations.  General Relativity told us ahead of time where it would fail, so we knew it couldn't be complete from the beginning.  The Standard Model, underpinned by Quantum Mechanics, took a little longer to reveal its gaps.

Also, the Uncertainty Principle is unlikely to be eliminated by a better theory, so there's an inbuilt and inescapable fuzziness to the limits of our knowledge.  At the particle level, reality is statistical.  We can only minimize the limits that puts on our detailed knowledge of the universe, but we can't eliminate it.

Personally, I think there probably is an ultimate Theory of Everything... but it might be 22nd or even 23rd century science, not 21st.  Every time we look at the universe in more detail, it surprises usβ€”hell, we hadn't even gotten a handle on dark matter before it threw dark energy at us.

With the Uncertainty Principle, there can't ever be a "final knowing".  Well, OK, maybe we could reach a point where we know what we can't know, but that's not the same thing as "knowing everything".
Atheist born, atheist bred.  And when I die, atheist dead!

Offline Sal1981

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #25 on: February 02, 2018, 05:42:34 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
With the Uncertainty Principle, there can't ever be a "final knowing".  Well, OK, maybe we could reach a point where we know what we can't know, but that's not the same thing as "knowing everything".
QM is statistical in nature, but You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login theory is not. It's a compelling alternative to classical QM, but in the early days it lost to the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login of QM.

I don't know which is more "correct", but I think pilot wave theory (De Broglie-Bohm theory) should at least be revisited.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool" --- Richard P. Feynman

Offline Baruch

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #26 on: February 02, 2018, 12:57:03 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
QM is statistical in nature, but You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login theory is not. It's a compelling alternative to classical QM, but in the early days it lost to the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login of QM.

I don't know which is more "correct", but I think pilot wave theory (De Broglie-Bohm theory) should at least be revisited.

There are fads in physical science, like height of skirts ... provided the answers work out the same.  So far, all acceptable interpretations of QM, produce the same results.  The idea of statistics as a panacea, was very big from WW II onward.  Classical math methods less so.  Now with Big Data, statistics is a fad again.
πŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽŒπŽ€πŽπŽŽπŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€πŽŸπŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽπŽ€πŽπŽ‰πŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€
luu shalmaata luu balt’aata
May you be well, may you be healthy

Offline Cavebear

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #27 on: February 02, 2018, 12:59:06 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
There are fads in physical science, like height of skirts ... provided the answers work out the same.  So far, all acceptable interpretations of QM, produce the same results.  The idea of statistics as a panacea, was very big from WW II onward.  Classical math methods less so.  Now with Big Data, statistics is a fad again.

Do YOU understand "pilot wave theory"?
Atheist born, atheist bred.  And when I die, atheist dead!

Offline Baruch

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #28 on: February 02, 2018, 01:06:57 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Do YOU understand "pilot wave theory"?

We saw a recent lab demonstration of this ... a model of course ... on a nearby thread.  If I can see it, then yes, I understand it ... the model, not the actual maths.  I could understand the maths, since I do understand the maths for the Dirac equation for example, but why would I go to that much trouble?  I am a geek, not a maniac ;-)
πŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽŒπŽ€πŽπŽŽπŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€πŽŸπŽπŽœπŽœπŽŸπŽπŽ€πŽπŽ‰πŽ€πŽ€πŽšπŽ€
luu shalmaata luu balt’aata
May you be well, may you be healthy

Offline Cavebear

Re: Thoughts About Relativity
« Reply #29 on: February 02, 2018, 01:36:14 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
We saw a recent lab demonstration of this ... a model of course ... on a nearby thread.  If I can see it, then yes, I understand it ... the model, not the actual maths.  I could understand the maths, since I do understand the maths for the Dirac equation for example, but why would I go to that much trouble?  I am a geek, not a maniac ;-)

You got me there.  I stopped at simultaneous equation and set theory (both of which I loved).
Atheist born, atheist bred.  And when I die, atheist dead!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk