Author Topic: Anti-natalist?  (Read 109 times)

Offline Baruch (OP)

Anti-natalist?
« on: November 28, 2017, 07:38:27 PM »
שלום

Online Hakurei Reimu

Re: Anti-natalist?
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2017, 07:59:44 PM »
Interesting, but that ship's already sailed for most of us.
Warning: Don't Tease The Miko!
(she bites!)
Spinny Miko Avatar shamelessly ripped off from Iosys' Neko Miko Reimu

Offline Baruch (OP)

Re: Anti-natalist?
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2017, 08:06:04 PM »
A couple people here loudly proclaim that they are nihilists ... but don't know if that means they are anti-natalists.  It still matters to me, because my daughter is anti-natalist ... and while I am not, I share her pessimism.

I follow Nietzsche ... I agree with all three axioms in this paper:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2099162.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 08:44:33 PM by Baruch »
שלום

Re: Anti-natalist?
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2017, 04:46:07 PM »
Anti-natalism is only logical. Look at how many children already exist in this world who need parents. Why create more.

It's just tons of people have this weird imperative to spawn their own children - to continue their own bloodline. I'm wondering if this imperative is biological and I'm just defunct, because almost everyone who I've talked to about this has it, while I never did.

Rather, I'm chiefly concerned with creating good, reasonable people - which I'm convinced has more to do with nurture than nature. The obsession with creating a person who looks like oneself makes no sense to me.

Offline Sal1981

Re: Anti-natalist?
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2017, 04:52:53 PM »
I liked the video in the bottom more, about Effective Altruism.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool" --- Richard P. Feynman

Offline Baruch (OP)

Re: Anti-natalist?
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2017, 06:59:55 PM »
Anti-natalism is only logical. Look at how many children already exist in this world who need parents. Why create more.

It's just tons of people have this weird imperative to spawn their own children - to continue their own bloodline. I'm wondering if this imperative is biological and I'm just defunct, because almost everyone who I've talked to about this has it, while I never did.

Rather, I'm chiefly concerned with creating good, reasonable people - which I'm convinced has more to do with nurture than nature. The obsession with creating a person who looks like oneself makes no sense to me.

There are people who aren't supposed to have sex.  There are people who aren't supposed to marry.  There are people who aren't supposed to parent.  I am not sure myself where I fall.  But I didn't have a child to propagate a blood-line.  Most children happen because of lust of the adults, an unplanned side effect.  My wife and I planned it, as a controlled experiment.  Blood-lines are important for old money ... like European aristocracy.  Don't know any such people personally.  Being a good teacher is a good thing ... see the movie, Goodbye, Mr Chips.
שלום