For those who are slightly math inclined see my blog:You are not allowed to view links.

Register or

Login. What's interesting is that his 1905 paper contained no calculus, no fancy math gymnastics to get his result. He does have a formula that he did not derive, but it was well-known at the time. I derived that formula in my next blog, You are not allowed to view links.

Register or

Login. Though here, a little math is

*de rigueur*. It's not for the faint- hearted. If you are also interested to know how Newton's is contained in Einstein's field equations, see: You are not allowed to view links.

Register or

LoginI've already posted these, but some disappeared after the last shuffle.

Thanks

Joe