https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html?utm_term=.469edfb58bdc (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html?utm_term=.469edfb58bdc)
QuoteThe Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases â€" including “fetus†and “transgender†â€" in any official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.
Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are “vulnerable,†“entitlement,†“diversity,†“transgender,†“fetus,†“evidence-based†and “science-based.â€
In some instances, the analysts were given alternative phrases. Instead of “science-based†or “evidence-based,†the suggested phrase is “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,†the person said. In other cases, no replacement words were immediately offered.
QuoteInstead of “science-based†or “evidence-based,†the suggested phrase is “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,†the person said. In other cases, no replacement words were immediately offered.
Quote from: Nineteen Eighty-FourThe greatest difficulty facing the compilers of the Newspeak Dictionary was not to invent new words, but, having invented them, to make sure what they meant: to make sure, that is to say, what ranges of words they cancelled by their existence.
damm Trump is a narcicist!!! has to change vocabulary so he can feel good about himself. The old coot also told the National Park Service to never say anything about global warming.
That is fucking horrifying.
"But her emails..."
Quote from: Atheon on December 16, 2017, 01:34:22 PM
"But her emails..."
Hahah ... Colin Powell did the same thing as SecState. He taught Hillary to do it. Bipartisan cluster F.
But yes, I can expect full on ideological purity ... both WH and DNC (see recent reports on DNC to insulate itself from all ideas of Bernie-bros).
See ... ideology is bad ... but only the wrong ideology ... not the idea of being a maniac.
Quote from: Draconic Aiur on December 16, 2017, 04:11:01 PM
Fuck em
Wrong laptop. You are thinking of the bottomless perverse porn on Weiner's laptop.
Quote from: Shiranu on December 15, 2017, 09:10:19 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html?utm_term=.469edfb58bdc (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html?utm_term=.469edfb58bdc)
More sad evidence that the Trumps are trying to change reality. I am not surprised given the short history of Trump's blitherings.
Quote from: Cavebear on December 18, 2017, 08:13:30 AM
More sad evidence that the Trumps are trying to change reality. I am not surprised given the short history of Trump's blitherings.
Old Dick Cheney technique .. he said that facts didn't matter, because their actions would define what the facts were.
Quote from: Baruch on December 16, 2017, 01:59:20 PM
Hahah ... Colin Powell did the same thing as SecState.
Powell is a Repube.
Quote from: Atheon on December 19, 2017, 04:02:21 AM
Powell is a Repube.
But but he is Black ... so you can't hate him, in fact BSSM "Black Sec State Matters". The recordings business goes back to FDR, Kennedy, JFK etc. They all do it.
Apparently more than half of the US citizens voted Republican in 2016.
Mostly because of rather that than Hillary.
IMO the system allowed a nominee that they thought that there is absolutely no chance of being elected. Spectacularly backfired.
Why is this innate hate everything Republican? I do not think they are any worse than the other side.
They are all cut from the same cloth.
TDS* is strong here.
*Trump Derangement Syndrome
Quote from: pr126 on December 19, 2017, 08:43:54 AM
Apparently more than half of the US citizens voted Republican in 2016.
Actually, 3 million more voted for Clinton than trump. The Electoral College fucked us.
Quote from: Mike Cl on December 19, 2017, 09:18:57 AM
Actually, 3 million more voted for Clinton than trump. The Electoral College fucked us.
Or so you are told.
But aside from all that, do you think Hillary would have been a better POTUS?
(I am not an American)
Quote from: pr126 on December 19, 2017, 09:29:47 AM
Or so you are told.
But aside from all that, do you think Hillary would have been a better POTUS?
(I am not an American)
How could she have been worse????
So, I've been told? I have checked many sources and they all agree on the vote count. No, I don't think there is or was any conspiracy to get the vote count wrong.
Quote from: pr126 on December 19, 2017, 09:29:47 AM
Or so you are told.
But aside from all that, do you think Hillary would have been a better POTUS?
(I am not an American)
About 60% of Americans voted, and 3 million more who did vote... voted Democrat over Republican. So how in all sweet fuck can you say that 50% of Americans voted Republican?
And the fuck is "...or so you are told" suppose to mean?
Can for once, can you just shut the fuck up about American politics and culture, when you have proven time and time again you know literally jack shit about us? Que chingados, guey...
Quote from: Mike Cl on December 19, 2017, 09:18:57 AM
Actually, 3 million more voted for Clinton than trump. The Electoral College fucked us.
Not the first time. But then I wouldn't allow millions of Americans to vote, if any at all. The Electoral College is a moot point. Instead of having a charade of an election, I would put the military in charge.
Quote from: Baruch on December 19, 2017, 06:36:16 PM
Not the first time. But then I wouldn't allow millions of Americans to vote, if any at all. The Electoral College is a moot point. Instead of having a charade of an election, I would put the military in charge.
The Electoral College is not a moot point. It is the only point. The Repubs have managed to gerrymander that, as well as the states.
Quote from: pr126 on December 19, 2017, 09:29:47 AM
Or so you are told.
But aside from all that, do you think Hillary would have been a better POTUS?
(I am not an American)
If there ever was a "choice between two evils", this was it.
Quote from: Feral Atheist on December 19, 2017, 09:49:07 PM
If there ever was a "choice between two evils", this was it.
Al Gore was also part of a political dynasty. So I am not sure of the 2000 election. John Kerry was part of the plutocracy. So were those elections vs George W any better? Control of the narrative, including control of any viable candidates ... is not new to 2016.
Quote from: Mike Cl on December 19, 2017, 08:16:56 PM
The Electoral College is not a moot point. It is the only point. The Repubs have managed to gerrymander that, as well as the states.
So who, other than the Pope ... will decide the precincts? Any decision by man ... is partisan. And D folks define the D position, as the non-partisan position!
Quote from: Baruch on December 20, 2017, 01:41:46 AM
So who, other than the Pope ... will decide the precincts? Any decision by man ... is partisan. And D folks define the D position, as the non-partisan position!
No. Actually you are ignoring the fact that there ARE people of honorably analytical nature. Judges are trained in such impartiality (some of them anyway. And as strange as it may seem, professional analysts would do that fairly.
I would too. And I would like to. The challenge of creating fair districts appeals to me. The question would be whether the directive was to create balanced districts for competitive elections or if the districts should be to creat the most geograghically compact districts.
I could go either way. Anything so long as the districts are not politically constructed.
Quote from: Cavebear on December 26, 2017, 03:19:54 AM
No. Actually you are ignoring the fact that there ARE people of honorably analytical nature. Judges are trained in such impartiality (some of them anyway. And as strange as it may seem, professional analysts would do that fairly.
I would too. And I would like to. The challenge of creating fair districts appeals to me. The question would be whether the directive was to create balanced districts for competitive elections or if the districts should be to creat the most geograghically compact districts.
I could go either way. Anything so long as the districts are not politically constructed.
Bullshit. I know even here, on this board, you want to be the Kilo Ren figure. Just give me absolute power, and I will make the DMV work like Clockwork Orange - Mussolini. Human beings are political animals - Aristotle
Quote from: Baruch on December 26, 2017, 08:45:01 AM
Bullshit. I know even here, on this board, you want to be the Kilo Ren figure. Just give me absolute power, and I will make the DMV work like Clockwork Orange - Mussolini. Human beings are political animals - Aristotle
No Bullshit, and understand THIS! I am too straightforward and analytical. I did my job in the Gummint for 30 years telling managers when they were wrong (and right) and I paid for it with lost promotions. I made a job based on reality and eventually was appreciated.
"Just the facts, please sir"...
You are a Vulcan trapped in the body of a Klingon? What a mess! No wonder, as a protected minority, you are so D-arty ;-)
Quote from: Baruch on December 26, 2017, 01:43:07 PM
You are a Vulcan trapped in the body of a Klingon? What a mess! No wonder, as a protected minority, you are so D-arty ;-)
Never said that, and that is too typical of you. I merely said that, given a rational request such as fair re-districting, I would act on it rationally and without intent to give advantage. Given a factual question, I reply factually.
Quote from: Cavebear on December 26, 2017, 02:15:37 PM
Never said that, and that is too typical of you. I merely said that, given a rational request such as fair re-districting, I would act on it rationally and without intent to give advantage. Given a factual question, I reply factually.
You are inhuman then. Nobody is non-partisan, least of all you!
Quote from: fencerider on December 16, 2017, 03:04:42 AM
damm Trump is a narcicist!!! has to change vocabulary so he can feel good about himself. The old coot also told the National Park Service to never say anything about global warming.
(https://i.imgflip.com/100q2a.jpg)
Quote from: pr126 on December 19, 2017, 09:29:47 AM
Or so you are told.
But aside from all that, do you think Hillary would have been a better POTUS?
(I am not an American)
YES
@ Mermaid
You, like so many other people on the left, you have been brainwashed by the Marxist to hate your country, your culture, and civilization and you don't even realize it.
You, like so many other people on the left, are working furiously to dismantle western civilization, to self-destruct.
Here is a question - what will you replace it with?
What kind of utopia do you have in mind?
The novel 1984 by George Orwell was a warning, not an instruction manual!
I am sorry that you have bought into such lies and delusion. That is no way to live, and it's sickening that corrupt, heartless men have convinced you that their ideology is the truth.
Quote from: Shiranu on December 27, 2017, 04:15:55 AM
I am sorry that you have bought into such lies and delusion. That is no way to live, and it's sickening that corrupt, heartless men have convinced you that their ideology is the truth.
You just described the last 5000 years of politics. I think that pr126 just needs less politics, and more hot cocoa.
Quote from: Baruch on December 27, 2017, 05:04:50 AM
You just described the last 5000 years of politics. I think that pr126 just needs less politics, and more hot cocoa.
To me, this time of year is stressful enough, getting wrapped up in politics at this time of year just makes it worse, better to focus on surviving the season before that comes up again.
Quote from: Munch on December 29, 2017, 04:49:51 PM
To me, this time of year is stressful enough, getting wrapped up in politics at this time of year just makes it worse, better to focus on surviving the season before that comes up again.
Honestly, it's reached the point where even I am burned out on politics, because at the end of the day it's reached a point where my country doesn't even pretend to represent me anymore. It's like living in Italy, or Mexico... the government is corrupt to it's core, and sure there are good people... but they don't have any power. Just instead of mafioso or cartels running the country, it's corporations and "white collar" crooks.
Much better to focus time and energy on social issues rather than political, at least until election day.
I'm taking a note from my brothers book, his approach is just to focus on the stuff close to you that matters. vote on the stuff you want to see changed, but if it doesn't work out, just remember the smaller stuff. Lifes to short to get stressed over things like politics all the time, and trust me, I've had a bucket load of stress over this season to even focus on politics
Its true we don't always see eye to eye on these things, but we can agree its better to take a step back from arguing online. Sometimes its good to have differing thoughts on the way the world works, but I'd always sooner people reach a middle ground near enough or agree to disagree. I've said some stuff myself sometimes I regret, just cause it seemed easier to throw it out.
Quote from: Munch on December 29, 2017, 05:13:09 PM
I'm taking a note from my brothers book, his approach is just to focus on the stuff close to you that matters. vote on the stuff you want to see changed, but if it doesn't work out, just remember the smaller stuff. Lifes to short to get stressed over things like politics all the time, and trust me, I've had a bucket load of stress over this season to even focus on politics
Its true we don't always see eye to eye on these things, but we can agree its better to take a step back from arguing online. Sometimes its good to have differing thoughts on the way the world works, but I'd always sooner people reach a middle ground near enough or agree to disagree. I've said some stuff myself sometimes I regret, just cause it seemed easier to throw it out.
Small stuff = what Trump or Hillary had for lunch
Big stuff = one coworker died this week, another had a still-born child
Quote from: Baruch on December 29, 2017, 06:34:01 PM
Small stuff = what Trump or Hillary had for lunch
Big stuff = one coworker died this week, another had a still-born child
I'll paraphrase, small stuff, as in stuff closer to home, friends, family, day to day stuff. Big stuff, being big sweeping things the rest of the world will hear about, changes, reforms, what can impact many people.
Quote from: pr126 on December 27, 2017, 02:35:21 AM
@ Mermaid
You, like so many other people on the left, you have been brainwashed by the Marxist to hate your country, your culture, and civilization and you don't even realize it.
You, like so many other people on the left, are working furiously to dismantle western civilization, to self-destruct.
Here is a question - what will you replace it with?
What kind of utopia do you have in mind?
The novel 1984 by George Orwell was a warning, not an instruction manual!
LOL
Quote from: Munch on December 29, 2017, 07:12:02 PM
I'll paraphrase, small stuff, as in stuff closer to home, friends, family, day to day stuff. Big stuff, being big sweeping things the rest of the world will hear about, changes, reforms, what can impact many people.
We aren't opposites, we are complementary. So let me compliment you on that ;-)
Mermaid wrote:QuoteLOL
You mean you don't know and don't give a shit.
Quote from: pr126 on December 27, 2017, 02:35:21 AMYou, like so many other people on the left, are working furiously to dismantle western civilization, to self-destruct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
Quote from: Hydra009 on December 30, 2017, 12:24:25 AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
Saul Alinsky 101
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNEhLWFXcAEd7hc.jpg)
Quote from: pr126 on December 30, 2017, 12:50:18 AM
Saul Alinsky 101
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNEhLWFXcAEd7hc.jpg)
Actually, the person saying that is an Alt Right (Nazi) who is saying that; that is the motto and operating method of the current Rep party.
Quote from: Mike Cl on December 30, 2017, 09:35:09 AM
Actually, the person saying that is an Alt Right (Nazi) who is saying that; that is the motto and operating method of the current Rep party.
Both parties do it, but the Republicans take it to an absurd extreme because their base is so gullible.
Quote from: pr126 on December 29, 2017, 11:53:43 PM
Mermaid wrote:You mean you don't know and don't give a shit.
Yes, that's exactly what I mean.
Quote from: Mike Cl on December 30, 2017, 09:35:09 AM
Actually, the person saying that is an Alt Right (Nazi) who is saying that; that is the motto and operating method of the current Rep party.
Current Dem party = communist ... but Stalin vs Mao vs Castro ... no true communist?
Quote from: SGOS on December 30, 2017, 09:53:12 AM
Both parties do it, but the Republicans take it to an absurd extreme because their base is so gullible.
Dems believe that Hillary is Mother Theresa. Some even believe that Bernie can bring Castro policies to the US. Is that gullible, or just treason.
Quote from: Baruch on December 30, 2017, 11:18:54 AM
Current Dem party = communist
Dems believe that Hillary is Mother Theresa.
Some even believe that Bernie can bring Castro policies to the US.
Hyperbole much?
Quote from: SGOS on December 30, 2017, 11:32:04 AM
Hyperbole much?
Dems don't use hyperbole ... they know the holy truth, the truth of the Platonic forms ... not.
Quote from: Baruch on December 30, 2017, 11:18:54 AM
Current Dem party = communist ... but Stalin vs Mao vs Castro ... no true communist?
You and a bunch of people throw that word 'communist' around a lot. Most don't know what the hell a communist is--do you?
And there is no such thing as a 'communist'. Never has been. There are/were Russian communists of various stripes, Chinese communists--each area or country has it's version of what a communist is. Basically what we have traditionally called a communist is an enemy. And each area/country had a dictator who was called a communist. They do not mean the same--never have; except for those who can't think or don't want to think.
OK ... how about ... if you say R is bad, I will say D is bad. Neither is true, but you make it so, with attitude. You could have a better attitude. If you said D is bad, I would say R is bad ... you think I am partial, but I am complete.
Quote from: Baruch on December 31, 2017, 01:21:21 AM
you think I am partial, but I am complete.
I can't take any more bullshit for today, and it's not even 8:00 AM.
Quote from: Baruch on December 31, 2017, 01:21:21 AM
OK ... how about ... if you say R is bad, I will say D is bad. Neither is true, but you make it so, with attitude. You could have a better attitude. If you said D is bad, I would say R is bad ... you think I am partial, but I am complete.
Yeah--you are completely partial. You remind me of the typical Repub of today--you love to sling labels around not caring what they really mean; create sound bytes that seemingly sound good, but are actually empty. I hear the term 'flip-flop' and think of you. I actually like my politicians to flip-flop--that means they can and will change their minds when there is evidence they should. I don't see how any sane, un-stupid person can look at any repub in office and think they are there to do a 'good' job. What has the repub party done lately that is of any value except to their own? And yes, I do realize you are a disillusioned Dem--so am I and probably just as bitter about it. I do not think the Dem party is our saviour--all politicians are out to line their pockets and do what those who have bought them want them to do. In my dream of dreams I'd like a party that actually does give a shit about the country as a whole.
Quote from: Mike Cl on December 31, 2017, 09:29:33 AM
Yeah--you are completely partial. You remind me of the typical Repub of today--you love to sling labels around not caring what they really mean; create sound bytes that seemingly sound good, but are actually empty. I hear the term 'flip-flop' and think of you. I actually like my politicians to flip-flop--that means they can and will change their minds when there is evidence they should. I don't see how any sane, un-stupid person can look at any repub in office and think they are there to do a 'good' job. What has the repub party done lately that is of any value except to their own? And yes, I do realize you are a disillusioned Dem--so am I and probably just as bitter about it. I do not think the Dem party is our saviour--all politicians are out to line their pockets and do what those who have bought them want them to do. In my dream of dreams I'd like a party that actually does give a shit about the country as a whole.
And Independent from 1996, didn't vote for Trump. Last R Presidential candidate I voted for, was in 1984. Yep, typical Republican ;-)
Yes, if you want a party that cares for real people, you have to go out and build one. American politics sucks because of the "wishing tree". I wish X was true!! What did you do, as a D-party member, if you still are one ... to make sure that the D party has good policies and good candidates? Typical voter for either party ... "well I showed up on election day" ... and many don't even do that.
I hope you have a good day, and a good new year. But then I am completely partial.
You keep talking about how your thinking is correct and everyone else is wrong. Your words are the words of a fool.
Quote from: Mermaid on December 31, 2017, 09:53:34 AM
You keep talking about how your thinking is correct and everyone else is wrong. Your words are the words of a fool.
Everything in the public domain, is a pissing contest unfortunately. I don't have to be correct, I just have to genuine. True to myself.
I know you have few words, but you do use them well. I hope you have a good day, and a good new year. But then I am a fool.
Quote from: Baruch on December 31, 2017, 09:56:08 AM
Everything in the public domain, is a pissing contest unfortunately. I don't have to be correct, I just have to genuine. True to myself.
I know you have few words, but you do use them well. I hope you have a good day, and a good new year. But then I am a fool.
Thank you. :)
Quote from: Baruch on December 31, 2017, 09:51:45 AM
And Independent from 1996, didn't vote for Trump. Last R Presidential candidate I voted for, was in 1984. Yep, typical Republican ;-)
Yes, if you want a party that cares for real people, you have to go out and build one. American politics sucks because of the "wishing tree". I wish X was true!! What did you do, as a D-party member, if you still are one ... to make sure that the D party has good policies and good candidates? Typical voter for either party ... "well I showed up on election day" ... and many don't even do that.
I hope you have a good day, and a good new year. But then I am completely partial.
I'm glad you realize you are completely partial. I am not a Dem--not since the late 70's. I vote independent; I look at the issues. Right now I'm registered as an independent. I have been registered as a rebup or a dem depending upon which primary I wanted to vote in. right now I am pretty much thinking the only cure for US politics is a total removal of all congressional members and start over.
And Baruch, I hope and wish a great day, year and the rest of your life, for you and your loved ones! Take care of yourself.
And one of Trump's favorite words is "MONEY"! It is now clear that he ran for office, expecting to lose, and planning to use the "candidate" fame to increase his wealth.
Quote from: Cavebear on January 10, 2018, 12:34:30 PM
And one of Trump's favorite words is "MONEY"! It is now clear that he ran for office, expecting to lose, and planning to use the "candidate" fame to increase his wealth.
Correct again. I have to enjoy all this Tea Party winning, even when you are the cracked pot.
Quote from: Mermaid on December 26, 2017, 06:24:50 PM
YES
Hmm, let's see. Raving inexperienced lunatic who threatens nuclear war and manages the tax laws to benefit himself or talented thoughtful person who thinks tax reform should benefit the mjority of th population...
Wow, that's a tough decision...
THINK, THINK...
Quote from: Cavebear on January 10, 2018, 03:51:06 PM
Hmm, let's see. Raving inexperienced lunatic who threatens nuclear war and manages the tax laws to benefit himself or talented thoughtful person who thinks tax reform should benefit the mjority of th population...
Wow, that's a tough decision...
THINK, THINK...
Sex maniac couple who corrupt in a way that makes Nixon look like a nun? Uranium One. Traitors. If you don't like how Republicans run their party, seize power, like you want to do here, and make them have a less embarrassing primary season.
Bill Clinton got one illicit blow job, and forever after both he and his wife are sex maniacs? Oh, come on!
Quote from: Unbeliever on January 10, 2018, 04:01:08 PM
Bill Clinton got one illicit blow job, and forever after both he and his wife are sex maniacs? Oh, come on!
https://www.dailywire.com/news/5749/both-trump-and-clinton-went-jeffrey-epsteins-sex-amanda-prestigiacomo
So ... you did the dance of the seven merchant banks for them? Salome, you bitch!
Trump has connections to Epstein too, but I didn't vote for him either.
Quote from: Unbeliever on January 10, 2018, 04:01:08 PM
Bill Clinton got one illicit blow job, and forever after both he and his wife are sex maniacs? Oh, come on!
Was all that about just one BJ? I didn't know that.
And Monica didn't even swallow, or there would have been such a stain on that blue dress!
Quote from: Unbeliever on January 10, 2018, 04:10:50 PM
And Monica didn't even swallow, or there would have been such a stain on that blue dress!
Didn't she even brag about the relationship, thinking it exciting?
That's how she got busted, her "friend" was wearing a wire.
Quote from: Unbeliever on January 10, 2018, 04:19:23 PM
That's how she got busted, her "friend" was wearing a wire.
So a consenting adult, with a consenting adult... And that's the same as teens stalked by a 30 something Moore? I don't get the equivalency.
Quote from: Unbeliever on January 10, 2018, 04:19:23 PM
That's how she got busted, her "friend" was wearing a wire.
All politicians are criminals, and known to the CIA. That ways, the CIA tells them how to vote. This is an old KGB technique.
Quote from: Cavebear on January 10, 2018, 04:22:47 PM
So a consenting adult, with a consenting adult... And that's the same as teens stalked by a 30 something Moore? I don't get the equivalency.
Is that you, Mr Weinstein? ;-) Consenting adults means ... RICO.
Yes, there are a lot of sex predators who post here, over the years. We saw that in the pro-pedophilia sting, and more recently in the pro-prostitution sting.
Quote from: Cavebear on January 10, 2018, 04:22:47 PM
So a consenting adult, with a consenting adult... And that's the same as teens stalked by a 30 something Moore? I don't get the equivalency.
I don't get it either, but apparently Baruch does.
Quote from: Unbeliever on January 10, 2018, 04:28:04 PM
I don't get it either, but apparently Baruch does.
Baruch would argue that a tent stake was a clothesline pole...
Quote from: Cavebear on January 10, 2018, 04:30:00 PM
Baruch would argue that a tent stake was a clothesline pole...
Vote for who you want ... but it doesn't matter when the CIA chooses the candidates, and counts the votes. See Stalin for a quote on that.
Quote from: Unbeliever on January 10, 2018, 04:28:04 PM
I don't get it either, but apparently Baruch does.
I didn't make them equal. Y'all did, and chose that a Democrat can shit out all his orifices without consequence.