Atheistforums.com

Science Section => Science General Discussion => Physics & Cosmology => Topic started by: trdsf on September 05, 2017, 08:49:02 AM

Title: The little probe that could
Post by: trdsf on September 05, 2017, 08:49:02 AM
September 5, 1977: NASA launches the Voyager 1 probe.

September 5, 2017: Still going strong, expected to last until 2025, our furthest space probe, and the first to reach interstellar space.  Wow.

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Family_portrait_%28Voyager_1%29.png)

This is the Family Portrait (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Portrait_%28Voyager%29), taken by Voyager 1, source of the Pale Blue Dot (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot) image, and the last imagery returned by either Voyager.

Happy 40th, and thank you.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Gawdzilla Sama on September 05, 2017, 10:32:31 AM
Them Dems just THROWING money away!
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: trdsf on September 05, 2017, 11:15:15 AM
Quote from: Gawdzilla Sama on September 05, 2017, 10:32:31 AM
Them Dems just THROWING money away!
Considering the launch date, it would have been approved under either the Nixon or Ford administration, and given the necessary time for building and testing, almost certainly under the Nixon.  Both Voyagers were originally planned to be an extension of the Mariner program, but the systems and mission scope were so far past anything attempted during Mariner it was decided to make it a new program.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Unbeliever on September 05, 2017, 01:22:10 PM
At least it was appropriately named! It's like the Energizer Bunny - it just keeps going and going. Long after humanity has extincted itself, it'll still be out there, representing the best part of us.

Maybe in some far future time it'll be found by something that can appreciate what it is and wonder who made it.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Gawdzilla Sama on September 05, 2017, 05:50:29 PM
Quote from: trdsf on September 05, 2017, 11:15:15 AM
Considering the launch date, it would have been approved under either the Nixon or Ford administration, and given the necessary time for building and testing, almost certainly under the Nixon.  Both Voyagers were originally planned to be an extension of the Mariner program, but the systems and mission scope were so far past anything attempted during Mariner it was decided to make it a new program.
There you go, using logic and facts again.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: pr126 on September 05, 2017, 11:23:30 PM
http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2017/09/relive-the-mind-blowing-photos-from-the-voyager-missions/
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Cavebear on September 07, 2017, 04:24:18 AM
We are receiving something like a trillionth of a watt from V1 and that is information.  Amazing. 
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Baruch on September 07, 2017, 07:03:30 AM
Quote from: Cavebear on September 07, 2017, 04:24:18 AM
We are receiving something like a trillionth of a watt from V1 and that is information.  Amazing.

Information theory ... can you pick the signal out of the noise ... is 1 vs 0 distinguishable.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Sal1981 on September 07, 2017, 08:12:51 AM
Quote from: Cavebear on September 07, 2017, 04:24:18 AM
We are receiving something like a trillionth of a watt from V1 and that is information.  Amazing. 
Requires massive observatory discs to gather that.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Cavebear on September 07, 2017, 09:00:40 AM
Quote from: Baruch on September 07, 2017, 07:03:30 AM
Information theory ... can you pick the signal out of the noise ... is 1 vs 0 distinguishable.

That is all that is required.  They amazing part is like the bicycling bear.  It isn't how well it does it, but that it does it at all.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: trdsf on September 07, 2017, 10:35:09 AM
Compared with most astronomical radio sources, Voyager 1 is actually comparatively bright.  It looks like this to the Very Long Baseline Array (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/voyager/multimedia/pia17047.html):

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/Voyager_1_Radio_Signal_21_Feb_2013.jpg)

The oblong shape is due to the array configuration, not anything inherent in the signal, and is about half an arc-second wide -- half the width of a penny, seen from 4km away.

And keep in mind, Voyager is using technology that's over 40 years old.  That's positively Jurassic in computer terms.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Cavebear on September 07, 2017, 09:03:02 PM
Quote from: trdsf on September 07, 2017, 10:35:09 AM
Compared with most astronomical radio sources, Voyager 1 is actually comparatively bright.  It looks like this to the Very Long Baseline Array (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/voyager/multimedia/pia17047.html):

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/Voyager_1_Radio_Signal_21_Feb_2013.jpg)

The oblong shape is due to the array configuration, not anything inherent in the signal, and is about half an arc-second wide -- half the width of a penny, seen from 4km away.

And keep in mind, Voyager is using technology that's over 40 years old.  That's positively Jurassic in computer terms.

It can't still be visible.  If it were, we could see every 2M NEO!
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: trdsf on September 08, 2017, 12:34:43 PM
Quote from: Cavebear on September 07, 2017, 09:03:02 PM
It can't still be visible.  If it were, we could see every 2M NEO!
That's how it looks in the radio spectrum, not an actual visible light image.  :)
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Cavebear on September 11, 2017, 05:44:17 AM
Quote from: trdsf on September 08, 2017, 12:34:43 PM
That's how it looks in the radio spectrum, not an actual visible light image.  :)

Oops, OK.  I appreciate the explanation.  There I go being literal again.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Gawdzilla Sama on September 16, 2017, 09:31:12 AM
Quote from: Cavebear on September 11, 2017, 05:44:17 AM
Oops, OK.  I appreciate the explanation.  There I go being literal again.
We literally expect it from  you now.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: trdsf on September 17, 2017, 12:29:19 AM
Quote from: Gawdzilla Sama on September 16, 2017, 09:31:12 AM
We literally expect it from  you now.
Figuratively speaking, anyway.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Gawdzilla Sama on September 17, 2017, 08:04:23 AM
Quote from: trdsf on September 17, 2017, 12:29:19 AM
Figuratively speaking, anyway.
That figure was ate quite a while ago.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Cavebear on September 19, 2017, 04:03:50 AM
Quote from: Gawdzilla Sama on September 16, 2017, 09:31:12 AM
We literally expect it from  you now.

Literal facts are sort of a focus of mine.  Beats the hell out of superstitions.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Baruch on September 19, 2017, 10:26:09 PM
Quote from: Cavebear on September 19, 2017, 04:03:50 AM
Literal facts are sort of a focus of mine.  Beats the hell out of superstitions.

No nuance for you ;-)  That and I hope you break a mirror, it would serve you right ;-)
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Cavebear on September 23, 2017, 04:39:00 AM
Quote from: Baruch on September 19, 2017, 10:26:09 PM
No nuance for you ;-)  That and I hope you break a mirror, it would serve you right ;-)

I broke a mirror once.  I picked up the pieces carefully and wrapped them up in many layers of newspaper and set it in a box in the trash.  No apparent change happened afterwards.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Gawdzilla Sama on September 23, 2017, 07:55:34 AM
Quote from: Cavebear on September 23, 2017, 04:39:00 AM
I broke a mirror once.  I picked up the pieces carefully and wrapped them up in many layers of newspaper and set it in a box in the trash.  No apparent change happened afterwards.
You have to do it at midnight at a crossroads under a full moon. Don't forget to walk widdershins three times or you've wasted all that work.
Title: Re: The little probe that could
Post by: Cavebear on September 23, 2017, 07:58:51 AM
Quote from: Gawdzilla Sama on September 23, 2017, 07:55:34 AM
You have to do it at midnight at a crossroads under a full moon. Don't forget to walk widdershins three times or you've wasted all that work.

Well, actually, I should have hidden by the front steps and flung the pieces like ninja stars at the deer eating my hostas.  But you never get those good ideas until it is too late.