:evil:
E = mc^2 is not the complete story, that is for masses at rest (zero velocity relative to your momentum); the Pythagorean analogue is much better, described in this YouTube video:
[youtube:1rne9r5s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnMIhxWRGNw[/youtube:1rne9r5s]
Or a more indepth of the same thing from my favorite physics channel
[youtube:1rne9r5s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkiCPMjpysc[/youtube:1rne9r5s]
For those who are slightly math inclined see my blog:Einstein's Derivation of the Famous Equation, E=mc2 (//http://soi.blogspot.ca/2013/06/einsteins-derivation-of-famous-equation.html). What's interesting is that his 1905 paper contained no calculus, no fancy math gymnastics to get his result. He does have a formula that he did not derive, but it was well-known at the time. I derived that formula in my next blog, Relativistic Doppler Effect (//http://soi.blogspot.ca/2013/06/relativistic-doppler-effect.html). Though here, a little math is de rigueur. It's not for the faint- hearted. If you are also interested to know how Newton's is contained in Einstein's field equations, see: Is Newtonian Gravitational Fields Valid Within General Relativity? (//http://soi.blogspot.ca/2013/05/is-newtonian-gravitational-fields-valid.html)
I've already posted these, but some disappeared after the last shuffle.
Thanks
Joe
:evil: